Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37870890›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Objectively Quantifying Pediatric Psychiatric Severity Using Artificial Intelligence, Voice Recognition Technology, and Universal Emotions: Pilot Study for Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Innovation to Address Youth Mental Health Crisis.

Desmond Caulley, Yared Alemu, Sedara Burson, Elizabeth Cárdenas Bautista, Girmaw Abebe Tadesse, Christopher Kottmyer, Laurent Aeschbach, Bryan Cheungvivatpant, Emre Sezgin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Desmond Caulley *School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6947-3709
Yared Alemu *TQIntelligence, Inc, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0377-7731
Sedara BursonTQIntelligence, Inc, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4426-1096
Elizabeth Cárdenas BautistaTQIntelligence, Inc, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5324-1197
Girmaw Abebe TadesseMicrosoft AI for Good Research Lab, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2648-9102
Christopher KottmyerSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5222-8328
Laurent AeschbachSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9870-6587
Bryan CheungvivatpantSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2030-7494
Emre SezginAbigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8798-9605
Georgia Institute of Technology · USMorehouse School of Medicine · USNationwide Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding Psychotherapy, particularly for youth, is a pressing challenge in the health care system. Traditional methods are resource-intensive, and there is a need for objective benchmarks to guide therapeutic interventions. Automated emotion detection from speech, using artificial intelligence, presents an emerging approach to address these challenges. Speech can carry vital information about emotional states, which can be used to improve mental health care services, especially when the person is suffering.

objectiveThis study aims to develop and evaluate automated methods for detecting the intensity of emotions (anger, fear, sadness, and happiness) in audio recordings of patients' speech. We also demonstrate the viability of deploying the models. Our model was validated in a previous publication by Alemu et al with limited voice samples. This follow-up study used significantly more voice samples to validate the previous model.

methodsWe used audio recordings of patients, specifically children with high adverse childhood experience (ACE) scores; the average ACE score was 5 or higher, at the highest risk for chronic disease and social or emotional problems; only 1 in 6 have a score of 4 or above. The patients' structured voice sample was collected by reading a fixed script. In total, 4 highly trained therapists classified audio segments based on a scoring process of 4 emotions and their intensity levels for each of the 4 different emotions. We experimented with various preprocessing methods, including denoising, voice-activity detection, and diarization. Additionally, we explored various model architectures, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformers. We trained emotion-specific transformer-based models and a generalized CNN-based model to predict emotion intensities.

resultsThe emotion-specific transformer-based model achieved a test-set precision and recall of 86% and 79%, respectively, for binary emotional intensity classification (high or low). In contrast, the CNN-based model, generalized to predict the intensity of 4 different emotions, achieved test-set precision and recall of 83% for each.

conclusionsAutomated emotion detection from patients' speech using artificial intelligence models is found to be feasible, leading to a high level of accuracy. The transformer-based model exhibited better performance in emotion-specific detection, while the CNN-based model showed promise in generalized emotion detection. These models can serve as valuable decision-support tools for pediatricians and mental health providers to triage youth to appropriate levels of mental health care services. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/51912.

Indexed as

adverse childhood experiencesartificial intelligenceat-risk youthmachine learningmental healthpediatricpediatricspredictive modelingsocial determinants of healthspeech biomarkerspeech-recognitiontraumatrauma and emotional distressvoice AIvoice marker

Identifiers

PMID37870890
PMCPMC10628686
OpenAlexW4386834254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.