ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2024
A position-adaptive noise-reduction method using a deep denoising filter bank for dedicated breast positron emission tomography images.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep unrolled regularization for limited-angle dual-panel positron emission mammography.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- Improved denoising scheme using three-dimensional multi-zone convolutional neural filters in dedicated breast positron emission tomography images.Radiological physics and technology · 2025Article
- Optimizing LM-DRAMA parameters and non-local means filtering to improve small-lesion detectability in SiPM-based TOF breast PET.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dedicated breast positron emission tomography (db-PET) is more sensitive than whole-body positron emission tomography and is thus expected to detect early stage breast cancer and determine treatment efficacy. However, it is challenging to decrease the sensitivity of the chest wall side at the edge of the detector, resulting in a relative increase in noise and a decrease in detectability. Longer acquisition times and injection of larger amounts of tracer improve image quality but increase the burden on the patient. Therefore, this study aimed to improve image quality via reconstruction with shorter acquisition time data using deep learning, which has recently been widely used as a noise reduction technique. In our proposed method, a multi-adaptive denoising filter bank structure was introduced by training the training data separately for each detector area because the noise characteristics of db-PET images vary at different locations. Input and ideal images were reconstructed based on 1- and 7-min collection data, respectively, using list mode data. The deep learning model used residual learning with an encoder-decoder structure. The image quality of the proposed method was superior to that of existing noise reduction filters such as Gaussian filters and nonlocal mean filters. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the maximum standardized uptake values before and after filtering using the proposed method. Taken together, the proposed method is useful as a noise reduction filter for db-PET images, as it can reduce the patient burden, scan time, and radiotracer amount in db-PET examinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.