ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2023
Biomechanical evaluation of intramedullary retrograde nail and dynamic condylar screw used in unstable distal femoral fractures.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distal femur fractures are a common problem in orthopedics. Intramedullary retrograde nails (IRN) and dynamic condylar screws (DCS) are generally used for the treatment of these fractures. In this study, it was aimed to mechanically evaluate and compare these two implants used for the treatment of distal femur fractures. In this study, an AOOTA 33C1.3 fracture was created on the intact femur obtained from computed tomography images. The fractures were fixed with DCS and IRN. Then the created models were imported into the ANSYS Workbench for finite element analysis to determine the most convenient mechanical fixation type. The distal region of the femur was loaded considering 75 kg-f, and the created models were constrained in all directions from the femoral head. The intact femur was also analyzed to compare it with the DCS and IRN fixation models. The von Mises stress, strain, and displacement results were examined to determine the damage risk. According to the results, the risk of damage is lower in the model of fixation with IRN. The normal strain distribution in the model fixed with IRN is closer to the model of an intact femur. For this reason, the risk of stress shielding in IRN fixation is less than in DCS fixation. However, the fracture lines were more stable in the fixation with the DCS. In conclusion, fracture fixation with IRN is mechanically more suitable for distal femur fractures in terms of fracture healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.