Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37870664›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2023

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Pre-existing Neurologic Autoimmune Disorders.

Raissa Aoun, Daniel Gratch, David Kaminetzky, Ilya Kister

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Journey: From Early Promise to Lasting Impact.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Managing paraneoplastic GABABMC neurology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Therapeutic advances in multiple sclerosis: Novel therapies (immune checkpoint inhibitors, CAR-T, Anti-CD40L).Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Raissa Aoun *Department of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 1st Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Daniel Gratch *Corinne Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 5 East 98th St, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
David KaminetzkyDepartment of Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 1st Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Ilya KisterNYU Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center, Department of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 240 East 38th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA. ilya.kister@nyulangone.org.
New York University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMultiple Sclerosis Center Of Northeastern New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for oncologic indications is associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases are at increased risk of irAEs and have largely been excluded from clinical trials of ICIs. Therefore, there is limited data on the safety of safety of ICIs in patients with pre-existing neurologic autoimmune diseases (nAIDs) such as myasthenia gravis and multiple sclerosis. This review aims to synthesize the literature on the post-marketing experience with ICI in patients with pre-existing nAID and to discuss possible strategies for mitigating the risk of post-ICI nAID relapses. RECENT

findingsPatients with pre-existing myasthenia gravis (MG), myositis, and paraneoplastic encephalitis appear highly susceptible to neurologic relapses of their underlying neurologic disorder following ICI initiation; these relapses can cause considerable morbidity and mortality. In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), the risk and severity of MS relapses following ICI appears to be relatively lower compared to MG. Preliminary evidence suggests that older MS patients with no recent focal neuroinflammatory activity may be safely treated with ICI. Among the several case reports of ICI in patients with a history of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), neurologic worsening was only recorded in one patient who was in the acute phase of GBS at the time of ICI start. Initiating an ICI in a patient with pre-existing nAID involves a complex risk-benefit discussion between the patient, their oncologist, and neurologist. Relevant issues to consider before ICI include the choice of disease-modifying therapy for nAID (if any) and strategies for promptly identifying and managing nAID relapses should they occur. Currently, the literature consists mainly of case reports and case series, subject to publication bias. Prospective studies of ICI in patients with nAID are needed to improve the level of evidence.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisMyasthenia GravisNeoplasmsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesRecurrenceImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAdverse eventsEncephalitisGuillain–Barre syndromeImmune checkpoint inhibitorsMultiple sclerosisMyasthenia gravisMyositis

Identifiers

PMID37870664
OpenAlexW4387866152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.