Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37870663›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024

Real-Time Visual Kinematic Feedback During Overground Walking Improves Gait Biomechanics in Individuals Post-Stroke.

Erica H Hinton, Russell Buffum, David Kingston, Nick Stergiou, Trisha Kesar, Samuel Bierner, Brian A Knarr

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05420857 (The Effects of Overground Visual Biofeedback on Walking Speed and Symmetry in Individuals Post-stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05420857 nacompletednot on this map

The Effects of Overground Visual Biofeedback on Walking Speed and Symmetry in Individuals Post-stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NebraskaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled15ConditionsStrokeArmsOverground Visual Biofeeback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Erica H HintonUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA. ehedrick@unomaha.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7841-5471
Russell BuffumUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA.
David KingstonUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA.
Nick StergiouUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA.
Trisha KesarEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Samuel BiernerUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Brian A KnarrUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA.
University of Nebraska at Omaha · USEmory University · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115458 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ESTABROOKS, PAUL · 2016 to 2025
$42.8M
Visual control of locomotion in people with Parkinsons diseaseP20GM109090 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA · PI STERGIOU, NIKOLAOS · 2014 to 2023
$20.5M
Impact of assistive device use during treadmill and overground walking post-strokeR15HD094194 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA · PI KNARR, BRIAN ANDREW · 2018 to 2018
$443k
NICHD NIH HHS R15 HD094194NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109090NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115458NIH HHS R15 HD094194NIH HHS U54 GM115458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treadmill-based gait rehabilitation protocols have shown that real-time visual biofeedback can promote learning of improved gait biomechanics, but previous feedback work has largely involved treadmill walking and not overground gait. The objective of this study was to determine the short-term response to hip extension visual biofeedback, with individuals post-stroke, during unconstrained overground walking. Individuals post-stroke typically have a decreased paretic propulsion and walking speed, but increasing hip extension angle may enable the paretic leg to better translate force anteriorly during push-off. Fourteen individuals post-stroke completed overground walking, one 6-min control bout without feedback, and three 6-min training bouts with real-time feedback. Data were recorded before and after the control bout, before and after the first training bout, and after the third training bout to assess the effects of training. Visual biofeedback consisted of a display attached to eyeglasses that showed one horizontal bar indicating the user's current hip angle and another symbolizing the target hip extension to be reached during training. On average, paretic hip extension angle (p = 0.014), trailing limb angle (p = 0.025), and propulsion (p = 0.011) were significantly higher after training. Walking speed increased but was not significantly higher after training (p = 0.089). Individuals demonstrated a greater increase in their hip extension angle (p = 0.035) and propulsion (p = 0.030) after the walking bout with feedback compared to the control bout, but changes in walking speed did not significantly differ (p = 0.583) between a control walking bout and a feedback bout. Our results show the feasibility of overground visual gait feedback and suggest that feedback regarding paretic hip extension angle enabled many individuals post-stroke to improve parameters important for their walking function.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationBiomechanical PhenomenaFeedbackGaitHumansWalkingHip extensionOverground trainingPropulsionReal-time biofeedbackStrokeTrailing limb angle

Identifiers

PMID37870663
PMCPMC11010657
OpenAlexW4387865237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.