Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37870592›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2023

Retrospective clinical study on the performance and aesthetic outcome of pressed lithium disilicate restorations in posterior teeth up to 8.3 years.

Stefanie Lindner, Iris Frasheri, Reinhard Hickel, Alexander Crispin, Andreas Kessler

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Survival of Partial Coverage Restorations on Posterior Teeth-A Scoping Review.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefanie LindnerDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Goethestr 70, 80336, Munich, Germany. Stefanie.Lindner@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Iris FrasheriDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Goethestr 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Reinhard HickelDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Goethestr 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Alexander CrispinDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Andreas KesslerDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Goethestr 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEvaluation of cumulative survival and complication rate of monolithic lithium disilicate inlays and partial crowns performed by supervised undergraduate students up to 8.3 years of clinical service. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective clinical study 143 lithium disilicate posterior restorations (IPS e.max Press) were examined according to the FDI criteria. A standardised questionnaire was used to determine patient satisfaction. The aesthetic outcome was evaluated by dentists and dental technicians using intraoral photographs. Data were descriptively analysed. Cumulative survival and success rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimation.

resultsThe cumulative survival rate of lithium disilicate restorations was 97.5% after a mean service time of 5.9 years and 95.0% after 8.3 years. The cumulative success rate decreased from 94.4% after 5.9 years to 30.7% after 8.3 years. Repairs were required for 7 restorations (4.9%), and 5 (3.5%) were classified as failures. The results of the questionnaire indicate a high level of patient satisfaction. The subjective aesthetics were assessed more critically by dental technicians compared to dentists.

conclusionLithium disilicate posterior restorations survived successfully up to 8.3 years when carried out by undergraduate students. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Pressed lithium disilicate glass ceramic inlays and partial crowns are reliable treatment options in posterior teeth.

Indexed as

CrownsDental Restoration FailureCeramicsDental PorcelainEsthetics, DentalHumansRetrospective StudiesDental Porcelainlithia disilicateCeramicFDI criteriaInlayPartial crownSurvival rate

Identifiers

PMID37870592
PMCPMC10713824
OpenAlexW4387866265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.