ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
[Possibilities and limits of intraoperative 2D imaging in trauma surgery].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe two-dimensional (2D) imaging represents an essential and cost-effective component of intraoperative position control in fracture stabilization, even in the era of new three-dimensional (3D) imaging capabilities.
objectiveThe aim of the present study, in addition to a current literature review, was to examine whether the intraoperative use of 2D images leads to a quality of fracture reduction comparable to postoperative computed tomographic (CT) analysis including 3D reconstructions. MATERIAL AND
methodsA comparative retrospective analysis of intraoperative 2D and postoperative 3D image data was performed on 21 acetabular fractures stabilized via a pararectus approach according to an established protocol using the Matta criteria.
resultsThe assessment of fracture reduction in intraoperative fluoroscopy compared with postoperative CT revealed a difference only in one case with respect to the categorization of the joint step reduction in the main loading zone.
conclusionIn the intraoperative use of 2D imaging for fracture treatment it is important to select the correct adjustment planes taking the anatomical conditions into account in order to achieve optimum assessability. In this way, the reduction result can be adequately displayed in fluoroscopy and is also comparable to the postoperative CT control. In addition, depending on the findings, optional intraoperative dynamic fluoroscopic assessment can have a direct influence on the further surgical procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37870559What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.