Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37870450›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2023

Genome-wide direct quantification of in vivo mutagenesis using high-accuracy paired-end and complementary consensus sequencing.

Xinyue You, Yiyi Cao, Takayoshi Suzuki, Jie Shao, Benzhan Zhu, Kenichi Masumura, Jing Xi, Weiying Liu, Xinyu Zhang, Yang Luan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Effect of sequencing platforms on the sensitivity of chemical mutation detection using Hawk-Seq™.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2024
    Article
  11. A Review of the Application of Spatial Transcriptomics in Neuroscience.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xinyue YouSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6927-3264
Yiyi CaoSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1498-5678
Takayoshi SuzukiDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki 210-9501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2261-5263
Jie ShaoState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9212-9685
Benzhan ZhuState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Kenichi MasumuraDivision of Risk Assessment, National Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki 210-9501, Japan.
Jing XiSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Weiying LiuSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Xinyu ZhangSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Yang LuanSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2211-7803
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNNational Institute of Health Sciences · JPResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences · CN

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Found 2021M702159Foundation of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 20142202700Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 41991314National Natural Science Foundation of China 21976200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Error-corrected next-generation sequencing (ecNGS) is an emerging technology for accurately measuring somatic mutations. Here, we report paired-end and complementary consensus sequencing (PECC-Seq), a high-accuracy ecNGS approach for genome-wide somatic mutation detection. We characterize a novel 2-aminoimidazolone lesion besides 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine and the resulting end-repair artifacts originating from NGS library preparation that obscure the sequencing accuracy of NGS. We modify library preparation protocol for the enzymatic removal of end-repair artifacts and improve the accuracy of our previously developed duplex consensus sequencing method. Optimized PECC-Seq shows an error rate of <5 × 10-8 with consensus bases compressed from approximately 25 Gb of raw sequencing data, enabling the accurate detection of low-abundance somatic mutations. We apply PECC-Seq to the quantification of in vivo mutagenesis. Compared with the classic gpt gene mutation assay using gpt delta transgenic mice, PECC-Seq exhibits high sensitivity in quantitatively measuring dose-dependent mutagenesis induced by Aristolochic acid I (AAI). Moreover, PECC-Seq specifically characterizes the distinct genome-wide mutational signatures of AAI, Benzo[a]pyrene, N-Nitroso-N-ethylurea and N-nitrosodiethylamine and reveals the mutational signature of Quinoline in common mouse models. Overall, our findings demonstrate that high-accuracy PECC-Seq is a promising tool for genome-wide somatic mutagenesis quantification and for in vivo mutagenicity testing.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAnimalsConsensusMaleMiceMice, TransgenicMutagenesisMutationSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID37870450
PMCPMC10681716
OpenAlexW4387866176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.