Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37870248›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2024

Exploration of the Content and Structure of Preferences for Leisure Activities of People Receiving Adult Day Services Using Concept Mapping.

Mike Rommerskirch-Manietta, Johannes M Bergmann, Christina Manietta, Daniel Purwins, Kimberly Van Haitsma, Katherine M Abbott, Martina Roes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mike Rommerskirch-ManiettaDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Witten, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1533-3006
Johannes M BergmannDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Witten, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9942-4633
Christina ManiettaDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Witten, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2832-6868
Daniel PurwinsDiakonie Osnabrück, Stadt und Land GmbH, Osnabrück, Lower Saxony, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0671-3242
Kimberly Van HaitsmaCollege of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3727-1336
Katherine M AbbottDepartment of Sociology and Gerontology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6815-2065
Martina RoesDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Witten, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4531-8584

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesProviding preferred leisure activities appears to be an important approach to support and empower people receiving adult day services (ADS) allowing them to age in place. To provide the conceptualization for a preference instrument, we actively involved people receiving ADS in exploring the content and structure of their preferences for leisure activities. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe chose a concept mapping methodology and involved 16 people receiving ADS. We systematically reviewed the literature and conducted semistructured interviews to generate a set of 80 preferences. Analysis of structuring these preferences resulted in a 3-dimensional cube with 12 clusters. A graphical representation was then interpreted, and the clusters were labeled.

resultsOur conceptualization divides preferences for leisure activities into the following: 1. Take a trip, 2. Revel in memories and catch up on the news (most important), 3. Do something for yourself and come to rest, 4. Play intelligence and parlor games, 5. Make/produce and try something alone or in a group, 6. Keep fit and cheer others on in sports (least important), 7. Learn, educate, and share knowledge, 8. Have contact with other people, 9. Attend at entertainment, cultural, and amusement events, 10. Enjoy music, your homeland, or other countries, 11. Engage in outdoor activities, and 12. Get involved, offer support, and provide companionship. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our results may lead to the development of instruments and thus opens the field for further research and theory building on preferences for leisure activities of people receiving ADS.

Indexed as

Leisure ActivitiesHumansCommunityDementiaLong-term carePerson-centeredPublic involvement

Identifiers

PMID37870248
PMCPMC11020227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.