Real-world study of the leakage of two types of infusion bags in multicenter pharmacy intravenous admixture service (PIVAS).

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Optimization design of solution preparation methods of three poorly soluble drugs of clinical use in infusions on orthogonal test and evaluation of stability study.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026
   Article
2. Evaluating and improving the accuracy of pediatric infusion dose using PDCA combined with HPLC: a quality improvement study from China.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2025
   Article
3. Investigation and analysis on the charging status and standard of pharmacy intravenous admixture service in China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as