ArticleIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research
Impact of Continued Social Network-based Learning Based on Midwives Knowledge and Implementation of the Helping Babies Breathe Program.
Article in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Standardised formal resuscitation training programmes for reducing mortality and morbidity in newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) program is a simple neonatal resuscitation protocol implemented in low-resource clinical systems. Therefore, it is necessary to train midwives on the implementation of this program and ensure the sustainability of the learned materials. The present study aimed to assess the impact of continued social network-based learning based on midwives knowledge and implementation of the HBB program. Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled field trial was performed on 50 midwives who were selected by the available sampling method. All midwives attended the HBB workshop; thereafter, in the intervention group, the learned materials were reinforced for 3 months using WhatsApp messenger. Data were collected using Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), which was administered before the HBB program and 3 months later (HBB guide; 2 Results: Based on the results, the mean knowledge score was not significantly different in both groups (control and intervention) immediately after the workshop. The mean scores of knowledge and skill variations did not decrease significantly in the WhatsApp group during the 3 months; nonetheless, a marked decrease was observed in the control group (t Conclusions: The results of this study pointed out that continued social network-based education promoted the knowledge and skills of health care providers, highlighting the importance of social networks in education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.