ArticleData in brief2023
The SMART Safety: An empirical dataset for evidence synthesis of adverse events.
Article in Data in brief, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward Evidence Synthesis of Adverse Events in Imbalanced Time-to-Event Data.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2026Article
- Assessment of inverse publication bias in safety outcomes: an empirical analysis.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Harm effects in non-registered versus registered randomized controlled trials of medications: a retrospective cohort study of clinical trials.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Influence of lack of blinding on the estimation of medication-related harms: a retrospective cohort study of randomized controlled trials.BMC medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence synthesis serves an important role to promote informed decision-making in healthcare practice. A key issue of evidence synthesis is the approach to deal with rare adverse events and the methods to address bias of harm effects. Empirical data is essential to help methodologists and statisticians to solve the issues in evidence synthesis of adverse events. For this reason, we have established SMART Safety dataset, the largest empirical dataset of meta-analyses of adverse events. The dataset contains 151 systematic reviews with 629 meta-analyses on safety outcomes, which covers more than 2,300 randomized controlled trials and 362 harm outcomes, with 10,069 rows and 45 columns of trial level information. All information was double- or even quadra-checked and further verified by referring the original source (e.g., the full-text of the included randomized trials) to ensure high validity of the data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.