ArticleData in brief2023
Dataset for the assessment of presence and performance in an augmented reality environment for motor imitation learning: A case-study on violinists.
Article in Data in brief, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Haptic feedback in violin education as a case study of robotic exoskeleton-mediated motor learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This dataset comprises motion capture, audio, and questionnaire data from violinists who underwent four augmented reality training sessions spanning a month. The motion capture data was meticulously recorded using a 42-marker Qualisys Animation marker set, capturing movement at a high rate of 120 Hz. Audio data was captured using two condenser microphones, boasting a bit depth of 24 and a sampling rate of 48 kHz. The dataset encompasses recordings from 2 violin orchestra section leaders and 11 participants. Initially, we collected motion capture (MoCap) and audio data from the section leaders, who performed 2 distinct musical pieces. These recordings were then utilized to create 2 avatars, each representing a section leader and their respective musical piece. Subsequently, each avatar was assigned to a group of violinists, forming groups of 5 and 6 participants. Throughout the experiment, participants rehearsed one piece four times using a 2D representation of the avatar, and the other piece four times using a 3D representation. During the practice sessions, participants were instructed to meticulously replicate the avatar's bowing techniques, encompassing gestures related to bowing, articulation, and dynamics. For each trial, we collected motion capture, audio data, and self-reported questionnaires from all participants. The questionnaires included the Witmer presence questionnaire, a subset of the Makransky presence questionnaire, the sense of musical agency questionnaire, as well as open-ended questions for participants to express their thoughts and experiences. Additionally, participants completed the Immersive Tendencies questionnaire, the Music Sophistication Index questionnaire, and provided demographic information before the first session commenced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.