ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2023
PM
Review in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of air pollution and increased risk of frailty.Age and ageing · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Climate Change and Food Allergy: Adaptations and Risks at the Intersection of Environment and Health.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Regional Disparities in Stroke Hospitalization and Mortality Associated with Long-Term Fine Particulate Matter Exposure: A Nationwide Ecological Study in Spain.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nanoparticle-Encapsulated 5-Azacytidine Attenuates Air Pollution-Induced Human Cardiac Fibroblast Activation.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Article
- Article
- Point source capture with storage yields superior aviation health benefits over direct air capture.Eco-Environment & Health · 2026Article
- Vertical Aerosol Structure Matters: Improving the AOD-PMEnvironmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Uterine Vulnerability to Environmental PMInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A two-year indoor-outdoor monitoring study of household clean air interventions during ambient and wildfire smoke periods in King County, Washington.Environmental research communications · 2026Article
- Extreme Weather Events, Air Pollution, and Cardiovascular Health: Mechanisms and Challenges.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- PMEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Gestational fine particulate matter exposure and perinatal outcomes in the ECHO cohort: Associations across pregnancy windows.Environmental research · 2026Article
- Outcomes of lung cancer screening by low-dose computed tomography in the health screening program.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Neighborhood environmental burden and cardiovascular health in Tianjin.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Suppressive Functions of Veratramine on PMBiomolecules · 2026Article
- Trends and projections of PMFrontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Short-term exposure to CO and NOFrontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Air Pollution Within the Public Health Exposome Framework: Impacts on Cardiovascular Health.Current epidemiology reports · 2026Review
- Air Pollution Levels in American Indian Communities in the Great Plains and Southwest: The Strong Heart Study.Atmospheric pollution research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Air pollution, especially exposure to particulate matter 2.5 (PM
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.