ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2023
Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization of Ruptured Aneurysms in the Acute Stage: Advantages and Disadvantages.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization for Ruptured Wide-Neck Aneurysms in the Acute Phase of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Single-Center Experience in Japan.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Limitations of Stent-Free Coil Embolization for Internal Carotid-Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms, Primarily Based on the Double-Catheter Technique: A Study Reflecting Current Endovascular Practice.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In the acute stage of ruptured cerebral aneurysms, limited devices are available, making the treatment difficult. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of the coil embolization with stenting for the ruptured cerebral aneurysms in the acute stage. Methods: We assessed 22 cases treated with stenting among 134 of 169 consecutive patients with subarachnoid hemorrhages undergoing an endovascular treatment between April 2014 and December 2021, of which 134 underwent an embolization during the acute stage. A stent was used in the patients wherein the treatment with the balloon-assisted or double catheter technique was difficult. Stenting was performed under the loading of two or more antiplatelet agents. Results: The mean age of the patients was 68.9 years, of which five were male and 14 (63.6%) had severe grade (World Federation of Neurosurgeons grade IV, V). The aneurysm site was the anterior communicating artery in four cases, internal carotid artery in nine, middle cerebral artery in two, vertebrobasilar artery in six, and posterior cerebral artery in one. The aneurysm shape was saccular in 13 cases, dissection in seven, and fusiform in two. Stents were used for wide-neck aneurysms in 12 cases, vascular preservation in seven, and rescue in three. The mean maximum diameter was 9.6 mm. The mean neck size was 6.4 mm. Complete occlusion and neck remnant were found in eight and seven cases, respectively. The perioperative complication rate was 45.5% (thromboembolism in five cases, stent occlusion in two, re-bleeding in two, and cerebral hemorrhage in one). The outcomes included modified Rankin Scale 0-2 in seven cases, 4-5 in five, and 6 in nine. Stent-related death occurred in one case. The rate of morbidity and mortality was 18.2%. Although stents were used in the acute stage of rupture, they were used for the right reasons. However, a high rate of complications occurred: two cases of re-bleeding, in which an incomplete occlusion was a factor. Conclusion: Stent placement in patients with the acute ruptured cerebral aneurysms should be carefully determined and efforts should be made to reduce the embolic and hemorrhagic complications. However, it may be an effective treatment option when other options could be extremely difficult.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.