ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2023
Multi-parametric optimization of magnetic resonance imaging sequences for magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is widely used in oncology for tumor staging, treatment response assessment, and radiation therapy (RT) planning. This study proposes a framework for automatic optimization of MRI sequences based on pulse sequence parameter sets (SPS) that are directly applied on the scanner, for application in RT planning. Materials and methods: A phantom with seven in-house fabricated contrasts was used for measurements. The proposed framework employed a derivative-free optimization algorithm to repeatedly update and execute a parametrized sequence on the MR scanner to acquire new data. In each iteration, the mean-square error was calculated based on the clinical application. Two clinically relevant optimization goals were pursued: achieving the same signal and therefore contrast as in a target image, and maximizing the signal difference (contrast) between specified tissue types. The framework was evaluated using two optimization methods: a covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES) and a genetic algorithm (GA). Results: The obtained results demonstrated the potential of the proposed framework for automatic optimization of MRI sequences. Both CMA-ES and GA methods showed promising results in achieving the two optimization goals, however, CMA-ES converged much faster as compared to GA. Conclusions: The proposed framework enables for automatic optimization of MRI sequences based on SPS that are directly applied on the scanner and it may be used to enhance the quality of MRI images for dedicated applications in MR-guided RT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.