Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37869414›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2023

Relationship between femoral component placement and patient-specific anatomical rotational landmarks in robotic arm assisted total knee Arthroplasty- a multicentric study.

Ravikumar Mukartihal, VikramG K Bhat, Rajdeep Das, S Chandan, Sharan S Patil, V Rathnakar, A V Gurava Reddy, Adarsh Annapareddy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ravikumar MukartihalSPARSH Group of Hospitals, Bangalore, India.
VikramG K BhatSPARSH Group of Hospitals, Bangalore, India.
Rajdeep DasSPARSH Group of Hospitals, Bangalore, India.
S ChandanSPARSH Group of Hospitals, Bangalore, India.
Sharan S PatilSPARSH Group of Hospitals, Bangalore, India.
V RathnakarDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sunshine Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.
A V Gurava ReddyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sunshine Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.
Adarsh AnnapareddyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sunshine Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Osteoarthritis of the knee is a common problem in the elderly, leading to severe morbidity. Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a widely validated surgery to provide a remarkable extent of knee function and simultaneously alleviates pain for knee osteoarthritis (OA). It is clearly understood that precision of the rotational alignment and accuracy of the technique in the placement of the femoral component is a prerequisite for excellent and successful outcomes of TKA. Advanced technology has now allowed surgeons to understand patient-specific variabilities in anatomical reference landmarks and the relationship of component positioning in relation to the reference landmarks to achieve accurate gap balancing with minimal soft tissue release. Materials and methods: A Prospective Observational Study of 1073 knees of patients of either sex above 50 years of age with Kellgren Lawrence Grade 4 Osteoarthritis of the knee which were confirmed with X-Ray undergoing RAA-TKA using MAKO Robotic System using Stryker Triathlon (Cruciate Substituting) CS Knee was conducted during the period between 2022 and 2023 in two South Indian hospitals specializing in joint replacement surgeries. Results: We found a statistically significant difference between the native Posterior Condylar Axis (PCA) (4.82 ± 2.15°) and final femoral component external rotation (3.24 ± 1.29°) with a p-value of <0.001 at 95% confidence interval. The accuracy of component size prediction was 99.8%. Also, analysis in our study has shown the most common implant sizes to be 4 in males and 2 in females. We also found no statistically significant difference based on age, size, laterality, or primary varus deformity. Conclusions: RAA-TKA provides patient-specific alignment/restricted kinematic alignment which might further enhance the outcome for the patient. Reliable deformity correction in coronal and sagittal planes can be achieved. Accurate flexion and extension gap balancing can be done through component placement and with minimal soft tissue dissection. Irrespective of all the advantages noted in RAA-TKA, further follow-up and long-term outcome studies are required to properly gauge and analyze this new technology.

Indexed as

Component positioningComponent sizeExternal rotationPosterior condylar axisRobotic knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID37869414
PMCPMC10585283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.