Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37869405›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2023

Bivalent Vaccine Effectiveness Among Adults Aged ≥65 Years During the BA.5-Predominant Period in Japan: The VENUS Study.

Wataru Mimura, Chieko Ishiguro, Junko Terada-Hirashima, Nobuaki Matsunaga, Megumi Maeda, Fumiko Murata, Haruhisa Fukuda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wataru MimuraSection of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Data Science, Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5704-343X
Chieko IshiguroSection of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Data Science, Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1302-9430
Junko Terada-HirashimaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuaki MatsunagaAMR Clinical Reference Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Megumi MaedaDepartment of Health Care Administration and Management, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan.
Fumiko MurataDepartment of Health Care Administration and Management, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan.
Haruhisa FukudaDepartment of Health Care Administration and Management, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan.
National Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPKyushu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron BA.5 became prevalent in July 2022 in Japan. Bivalent messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines were approved as booster doses for individuals who received the primary series or booster dose by monovalent vaccines. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of bivalent vaccines in Japanese adults aged ≥65 years. Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study using data collected from January 2019 to February 2023 in Japan. We included individuals aged ≥65 years in a municipality who received the first or second booster dose of monovalent mRNA vaccines. We estimated the effectiveness of the second or third booster dose of bivalent mRNA vaccines during the Omicron BA.5-predominant period (July-December 2022), compared with ≥90 days after the booster dose of monovalent vaccines. We used a Cox proportional hazard regression model with vaccination status as a time-dependent covariate. Results: A total of 81 977 individuals aged ≥65 years (mean [standard deviation] age, 78.3 [7.4] years; 33 487 male [40.8%]) were included in the study cohort. Among them, 57 396 were vaccinated with the second or third dose of bivalent vaccines (BA.1 or BA.4/5). The effectiveness against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was estimated to be 57.9% (95% confidence interval, 52.7%-62.5%) for ≥14 days after the second or third bivalent booster dose, compared with 90 days after the first or second monovalent booster dose. Conclusions: The study showed that the bivalent mRNA vaccines as the second and third doses would provide protection against COVID-19 among adults ≥65 years in Japan.

Indexed as

COVID-19effectivenessmRNA vaccineobservational studySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37869405
PMCPMC10588616
OpenAlexW4387701157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.