ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Quality assessment of transperineal ultrasound in Chinese tertiary medical centers: a multicenter study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence Supported Analysis of Anal Sphincter and Levator Ani Muscle Using Medical Imaging Techniques: A Systematic Review.International urogynecology journal · 2026Pooled it
- Image-Quality Assessment of the Levator Ani Immediately After Delivery.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Quantitative assessment of pelvic floor alterations following hysterectomy and bilateral adnexectomy using shear wave elastography and ultrasonography: a retrospective case-control study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Utilizing intelligent pelvic floor ultrasonography combined with real-time shear wave elastography for evaluating female pelvic floor functions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) is a vital examination method for diagnosing pelvic floor diseases. However, the quality of TPUS largely relies on the operator's experience, and there is a lack of studies on the evaluation of TPUS quality. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the quality of TPUS examinations in Chinese tertiary medical centers. Methods: This multicenter study conducted in 44 Chinese tertiary medical centers recruited postpartum women between September 2020 and September 2021. All participants underwent a standardized inquiry and TPUS examination. The participating centers were required to submit 5 parts of ultrasound data to the National Ultrasound Quality Control Center: 2-dimensional images at rest, 2-dimensional images at strain; 4-dimensional images of the levator ani hiatus; 4-dimensional images of the levator ani muscle; and 4-dimensional images of the anal sphincter. Quality assessment was performed by 2 experts with more than 5 years of experience in TPUS, and the reasons for nonqualification were stated. Results: In this study, 31 hospitals that were distributed across 20 provinces in China were included, submitting 2,251 cases in total. The overall qualified rate ranged from 12.00% to 86.92%. In each part, the qualified rate of 2-dimensional images at rest, 2-dimensional images at straining, levator ani hiatus, levator ani muscle, and anal sphincter was 94.27% (2,122/2,251), 78.54% (1,768/2,251), 85.52% (1,925/2,251), 93.03% (2,094/2,251), and 88.09% (1,983/2,251), respectively. Most of the nonqualified images belonged to 2-dimensional images at strain, and the errors in image acquisition (221/483, 45.76%) and measurement (262/483, 54.24%) were the main reasons for nonqualification. For levator ani hiatus images, error in image acquisition (275/326, 84.36%) was the main reason for nonqualification. Reconstruction error was the most common reason for nonqualification for levator ani muscle (133/157, 84.71%) and anal sphincter images (133/268, 49.63%). Conclusions: This multicenter study assessed the quality of TPUS in tertiary medical centers in China and identified the common reasons for nonqualification in each part. These findings can aid in forming the basis for quality control management and training for TPUS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.