Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37869344›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

Prognostic prediction of left ventricular myocardial noncompaction using machine learning and cardiac magnetic resonance radiomics.

Pei-Lun Han, Ze-Kun Jiang, Ran Gu, Shan Huang, Yu Jiang, Zhi-Gang Yang, Kang Li

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pei-Lun Han *Department of Radiology and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ze-Kun Jiang *Department of Radiology and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ran GuSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Shan HuangDepartment of Radiology and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yu JiangDepartment of Radiology and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhi-Gang Yang *Department of Radiology and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Kang Li *Department of Radiology and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
West China Medical Center of Sichuan University · CNShanghai Artificial Intelligence LaboratoryUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although there are many studies on the prognostic factors of left ventricular myocardial noncompaction (LVNC), the determinants are varied and not entirely consistent. This study aimed to build predictive models using radiomics features and machine learning to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with LVNC. Methods: In total, 96 patients with LVNC were included and randomly divided into training and test cohorts. A total of 105 cine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived radiomics features and 35 clinical characteristics were extracted. Five different oversampling algorithms were compared for selection of the optimal imbalanced processing. Feature importance was assessed with extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). We compared the performance of 5 machine learning classification methods with different sample:feature ratios to determine the optimal hybrid classification strategy. Subsequently, radiomics, clinical, and combined radiomics-clinical models were developed and compared. Results: The machine learning pipeline included an adaptive synthetic (ADASYN) algorithm for imbalanced processing, XGBoost feature selection with a sample:feature ratio of 10, and support vector machine (SVM) modeling. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of the radiomics model, clinical model, and combined model in the validation cohort were 0.87 (sensitivity 83.33%, specificity 64.29%), 0.65 (sensitivity 16.67%, specificity 78.57%), and 0.92 (specificity 33.33%, sensitivity 100.00%), respectively. The radiomics model performed similarly to the clinical and combined models (P=0.124 and P=0.621, respectively). The performance of the combined model was significantly better than that of the clinical model (P=0.003). Conclusions: The machine learning-based cine CMR radiomics model performed well at predicting MACEs in patients with LVNC. Adding radiomics features offered incremental prognostic value over clinical factors alone.

Indexed as

left ventricular myocardial noncompaction (LVNC)Machine learningmagnetic resonance imagingprognosisradiomics

Identifiers

PMID37869344
PMCPMC10585548
OpenAlexW4387023506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.