ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Deep learning-based cardiothoracic ratio measurement on chest radiograph: accuracy improvement without self-annotation.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The two-stage detection-after-segmentation model improves the accuracy of identifying subdiaphragmatic lesions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A reproducible and accurate automated approach to measuring cardiothoracic ratio on chest radiographs is warranted. This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based model for estimating the cardiothoracic ratio on chest radiographs without requiring self-annotation and to compare its results with those of manual measurements. Methods: The U-net architecture was designed to segment the right and left lungs and the cardiac shadow, from chest radiographs. The cardiothoracic ratio was then calculated using these labels by a mathematical algorithm. The initial model of deep learning-based cardiothoracic ratio measurement was developed using open-source 247 chest radiographs that had already been annotated. The advanced model was developed using a training dataset of 729 original chest radiographs, the labels of which were generated by the initial model and then screened. The cardiothoracic ratio of the two models was estimated in an independent test set of 120 original cases, and the results were compared to those obtained through manual measurement by four radiologists and the image-reading reports. Results: The means and standard deviations of the cardiothoracic ratio were 52.4% and 9.8% for the initial model, 51.0% and 9.3% for the advanced model, and 49.8% and 9.4% for the total of four manual measurements, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the cardiothoracic ratio ranged from 0.91 to 0.93 between the advanced model and the manual measurements, whereas those for the initial model and the manual measurements ranged from 0.77 to 0.82. Conclusions: Deep learning-based cardiothoracic ratio estimation on chest radiographs correlated favorably with the results obtained through manual measurements by radiologists. When the model was trained on additional local images generated by the initial model, the correlation with manual measurement improved even more than the initial model alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.