ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Artificial intelligence versus radiologist in the accuracy of fracture detection based on computed tomography images: a multi-dimensional, multi-region analysis.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-Assisted Fracture Detection in Orthopedic and Trauma Imaging: Where It Works, Where It Fails, and Principles for Safe Clinical Deployment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- FAD-MIL: a weakly supervised fracture detection model based on X-ray images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AI is already in the theatre of war just not on the side of the patient: clinical chatbots, telemedicine, and an agenda for "AI for medical humanity".Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Automatic Fracture Detection Convolutional Neural Network with Multiple Attention Blocks Using Multi-Region X-Ray Data.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bibliometric analysis of the application of artificial intelligence in orthopedic imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Potential strength and weakness of artificial intelligence integration in emergency radiology: a review of diagnostic utilizations and applications in patient care optimization.Emergency radiology · 2024Review
- Quantitative analysis of sagittal curvatures of the tibial plafond by computed tomography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- CT radiomics to differentiate neuroendocrine neoplasm from adenocarcinoma in patients with a peripheral solid pulmonary nodule: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- A review on artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of fractures in facial trauma imaging.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Extremities fractures are a leading cause of death and disability, especially in the elderly. Avulsion fracture are also the most commonly missed diagnosis, and delayed diagnosis leads to higher litigation rates. Therefore, this study evaluates the diagnostic efficiency of the artificial intelligence (AI) model before and after optimization based on computed tomography (CT) images and then compares it with that of radiologists, especially for avulsion fractures. Methods: The digital X-ray photography [digital radiography (DR)] and CT images of adult limb trauma in our hospital from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively collected, with or without 1 or more fractures of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand, hip, knee, ankle, and foot. Labeling of the fracture referred to the visualization of the fracture on the corresponding CT images. After training the pre-optimized AI model, the diagnostic performance of the pre-optimized AI, optimized AI model, and the initial radiological reports were evaluated. For the lesion level, the detection rate of avulsion and non-avulsion fractures was analyzed, whereas for the case level, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were compared among them. Results: The total datasets (1,035 cases) were divided into a training set (n=675), a validation set (n=169), and a test set (n=191) in a balanced joint distribution. At the lesion level, the detection rates of avulsion fracture (57.89% Conclusions: The optimized AI model improves the diagnostic efficacy in detecting extremity fractures on radiographs, and the optimized AI model is significantly better than radiologists in detecting avulsion fractures, which may be helpful in the clinical practice of orthopedic emergency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.