ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Development and validation of a fully automatic tissue delineation model for brain metastasis using a deep neural network.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improved automatic segmentation of brain metastasis gross tumor volume in computed tomography images for radiotherapy: a position attention module for U-Net architecture.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment planning requires accurate delineation of brain metastases, a task that can be tedious and time-consuming. Although studies have explored the use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for automatic brain metastases delineation, none of these studies have performed clinical evaluation, raising concerns about clinical applicability. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) tool for the automatic delineation of single brain metastasis that could be integrated into clinical practice. Methods: Data from 426 patients with postcontrast T1-weighted MRIs who underwent SRS between March 2007 and August 2019 were retrospectively collected and divided into training, validation, and testing cohorts of 299, 42, and 85 patients, respectively. Two Gamma Knife (GK) surgeons contoured the brain metastases as the ground truth. A novel 2.5D CNN network was developed for single brain metastasis delineation. The mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and average surface distance (ASD) were used to assess the performance of this method. Results: The mean DSC and ASD values were 88.34%±5.00% and 0.35±0.21 mm, respectively, for the contours generated with the AI tool based on the testing set. The DSC measure of the AI tool's performance was dependent on metastatic shape, reinforcement shape, and the existence of peritumoral edema (all P values <0.05). The clinical experts' subjective assessments showed that 415 out of 572 slices (72.6%) in the testing cohort were acceptable for clinical usage without revision. The average time spent editing an AI-generated contour compared with time spent with manual contouring was 74 Conclusions: The contours delineated with the AI tool for single brain metastasis were in close agreement with the ground truth. The developed AI tool can effectively reduce contouring time and aid in GK treatment planning of single brain metastasis in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.