Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37869330›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

Coronary computed tomography angiography analysis using artificial intelligence for stenosis quantification and stent segmentation: a multicenter study.

Qingtao Meng, Pengxin Yu, Siyuan Yin, Xiaofeng Li, Yitong Chang, Wei Xu, Chunmao Wu, Na Xu, Huan Zhang, Yu Wang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Qingtao MengDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Chuzhou Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Chuzhou, China.
Pengxin YuInfervision Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Siyuan YinInfervision Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Xiaofeng LiInfervision Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Yitong ChangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Chuzhou Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Chuzhou, China.
Wei XuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Chuzhou Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Chuzhou, China.
Chunmao WuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Chuzhou Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Chuzhou, China.
Na XuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Chuzhou Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Chuzhou, China.
Huan ZhangInfervision Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Yu WangInfervision Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Hong ShenInfervision Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Rongguo ZhangInfervision Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Qingyue ZhangInfervision Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate interpretation of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a labor-intensive and expertise-driven endeavor, as inexperienced readers may inadvertently overestimate stenosis severity. Recent artificial intelligence (AI) advances in medical imaging present compelling prospects for auxiliary diagnostic tools in CCTA. This study aimed to externally validate an AI-assisted analysis system capable of rapidly evaluating stenosis severity, exploring its potential integration into routine clinical workflows. Methods: This multicenter study consisted of an internal and external cohort of patients who underwent CCTA scans between April 2017 and February 2023. CCTA scans were evaluated using Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) scores to determine stenosis severity, while ground-truth stents were manually annotated by expert readers. The InferRead CT Heart (version 1.6; Infervision Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), which incorporates AI-assisted coronary artery stenosis quantification and automatic stent segmentation, was employed for CCTA scan analysis. AI-based stenosis assessment performance was determined using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), while the AI-based stent segmentation overlap was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Results: For ≥50% stenosis diagnoses, the AI system attained per-patient sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV surpassing 90.0% for the internal dataset; for the external dataset, the per-patient values were 88.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 81.0-94.4%], 94.5% (95% CI: 90.7-97.6%), 90.0% (95% CI: 83.3-95.6%), and 93.4% (95% CI: 89.2-96.8%), respectively. For ≥70% stenosis diagnoses, the per-patient values on the internal dataset were 94.2% (95% CI: 89.2-98.1%), 95.8% (95% CI: 94.1-97.4%), 80.8% (95% CI: 73.5-87.7%), and 98.9% (95% CI: 97.9-99.6%), respectively; for the external dataset, the per-patient values were 91.9% (95% CI: 82.6-100.0%), 97.3% (95% CI: 94.9-99.1%), 85.0% (95% CI: 72.5-94.6%), and 98.6% (95% CI: 96.8-100.0%), respectively. Regarding CAD-RADS categorization, the Cohen kappa was 0.75 and 0.81 for the internal per-patient and per-vessel basis, respectively, and 0.72 and 0.76 for the external per-patient and per-vessel basis, respectively. The DSC for stent segmentation was 0.96±0.06. Conclusions: The AI-assisted analysis system for CCTA interpretation exhibited exceptional proficiency in stenosis quantification and stent segmentation, indicating that AI holds considerable potential in advancing CCTA postprocessing techniques.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)Coronary artery disease (CAD)coronary artery stenosiscoronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)deep learning

Identifiers

PMID37869330
PMCPMC10585569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.