ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Diagnostic efficacy of quantitative ultrasonography for anterior disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06713356 (Ultrasonographic Assessment in Comparison to MRI in Diagnosis of TMJ Internal Derangement), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ultrasonographic Assessment in Comparison to MRI in Diagnosis of TMJ Internal Derangement
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anterior Disc Displacement of Temporomandibular Joint: Imaging Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Treatment.International journal of general medicine · 2025Review
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Dynamic High-Resolution Ultrasonography in Assessing Anterior Disc Displacement in Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: A Prospective Observational Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ultrasonography has been applied as an alternative method in the assessment of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pathology including anterior disc displacement (ADD). However, a concrete screening or diagnostic method which is feasible in clinical practice has not yet been established. The study aimed to establish a quantitative ultrasonographic method and determine its diagnostic efficacy for ADD of the TMJ. Methods: A total of 75 joints were allocated to either the normal disc position (NDP) group or the ADD group using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the reference standard. Longitudinal scans of the lateral articular compartment were obtained by a 14-MHz L-shaped linear array transducer. The width of the lateral joint space (LJS), the upper lateral joint space (ULJS), and the lower lateral joint space (LLJS), as well as the position of the lateral articular disc edge (ADE), were investigated by stepwise logistic regression analysis to identify significant indicators of ADD and to build a diagnostic model. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy were computed at the optimal cut-off value. Results: MRI detected 25 joints in the NDP group and 50 joints in the ADD group. Correlation analysis indicated that all 4 variables were associated with ADD. With the best performance of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.939, LJS and ULJS were identified as predictors of ADD and subsequently adopted to build a diagnostic model by stepwise logistic regression. The optimal cut-off value of the 2-variable regression model for diagnosing ADD was 0.800, with a sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 96%, PPV of 97.6%, NPV of 72.7%, and an accuracy of 86.7%. Conclusions: The quantitative ultrasonographic diagnostic method showed promising diagnostic efficacy. It has the potential to be used for ADD screening in future clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.