ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Validation of a deep learning-based software for automated analysis of T2 mapping in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence and myocarditis-a systematic review of current applications.Heart failure reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Prognostic significance of artificial intelligence-quantified late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2026Article
- The role of artificial intelligence in early detection and risk prediction of ischemic heart disease.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Towards fully automated synthetic ECV quantification: an open-access machine learning-based approach for fast blood draw-free CMR.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep learning for cardiac MRI: performance evidence and barriers to clinical integration. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Advanced Myocardial MRI Tissue Characterization Combining Contrast Agent-Free T1-Rho Mapping With Fully Automated Analysis.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- Convolutional neural networks for automatic MR classification of myocardial iron overload in thalassemia major patients.European radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The reliability and diagnostic performance of deep learning (DL)-based automated T2 measurements on T2 map of 3.0-T cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using multi-institutional datasets have not been investigated. We aimed to evaluate the performance of a DL-based software for measuring automated T2 values from 3.0-T cardiac MRI obtained at two centers. Methods: Eighty-three subjects were retrospectively enrolled from two centers (42 healthy subjects and 41 patients with myocarditis) to validate a commercial DL-based software that was trained to segment the left ventricular myocardium and measure T2 values on T2 mapping sequences. Manual reference T2 values by two experienced radiologists and those calculated by the DL-based software were obtained. The segmentation performance of the DL-based software and the non-inferiority of automated T2 values were assessed compared with the manual reference standard per segment level. The software's performance in detecting elevated T2 values was assessed by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy per segment. Results: The average Dice similarity coefficient for segmentation of myocardium on T2 maps was 0.844. The automated T2 values were non-inferior to the manual reference T2 values on a per-segment analysis (45.35 Conclusions: The DL-based software for automated T2 map analysis yields non-inferior measurements at the per-segment level and good performance for detecting myocardial segments with elevated T2 values compared with manual analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.