Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37869259›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2023

Enhanced molecular dynamic simulation studies unravel long-range effects caused by sequence variations and partner binding in RNA aptamers.

Ida Autiero, Luigi Vitagliano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ida AutieroInstitute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, Via Pietro Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Luigi VitaglianoInstitute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, Via Pietro Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsic flexibility and structural modularity are two common features of RNA molecules. Although functionally crucial, RNA plasticity often represents a major complication in high-resolution structural studies. To overcome this problem, RNAs may be rigidified through the complexation with high-affinity partners such as Fab molecules. This approach has been previously used to characterize the DIR2-aptamer. However, possible perturbations induced by the insertion of the Fab binding site on the DIR2-aptamer conformational properties were not investigated. Here, using enhanced molecular dynamics simulations, we compared the dynamics of the DIR2 aptamer holding the Fab binding site with that of the parental sequence. Our results suggest that the L2-loop modification for the Fab recognition leads to a significant increase in local flexibility that also affects the mobility of distant regions. The trajectories provide clear indications of the groups and the interactions mediating the dynamics transfer in DIR2. The effectiveness of our approach in addressing RNA flexibility was further corroborated by showing its ability to reproduce the most important events affecting the NF-κB RNA aptamer upon dissociation from the partner. Therefore, REMD analyses, a rarely adopted technique to unravel the structural/dynamical properties of aptamers, could efficiently complement experimental data guiding the rational design of nucleic acid therapeutics.

Indexed as

aptamerflexibilityMT: Oligonucleotides: Therapies and Applicationsnucleic acidsplasticityrational designREMD simulationRNA conformational distributionsequence-structure relationshipsstructural RNA motifs

Identifiers

PMID37869259
PMCPMC10585333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.