Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37869244›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of oncology2023

Folfirinox vs. Gemcitabine + Nab-Paclitaxel as the First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nooraldin Merza, Sabeeh Khawar Farooqui, Sophia Haroon Dar, Tony Varughese, Rehmat Ullah Awan, Lamaan Qureshi, Saad Ali Ansari, Hadi Qureshi, Jamie Mcilvaine, Ishaan Vohra and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Nooraldin MerzaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7198-1617
Sabeeh Khawar FarooquiDepartment of Medicine, Ziauddin Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sophia Haroon DarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Long Island Jewish Medical Center-Northshore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Tony VarugheseDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Rehmat Ullah AwanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ochsner Rush Hospital, Meridian, MS, USA.
Lamaan QureshiEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovations, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Saad Ali AnsariDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California, Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, CA, USA.
Hadi QureshiSchool of Liberal Arts, Arizona State University, Maricopa, AZ, USA.
Jamie McilvaineDepartment of OBGYN-Rutgers Jersey City, Jersey City, NJ, USA.
Ishaan VohraGastroenterology Department, University of Illinois, Peoria, IL, USA.
Yusuf NawrasUniversity of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA.
Abdallah KobeissyDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Mona HassanDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
University of Toledo · USHackensack University Medical Center · USHealth Innovations (United States) · USIllinois College · USMaricopa Medical Center · USMeridian Institute · USNorth Shore University Hospital · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of California, Riverside · USZiauddin University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The efficacy and safety of Folfirinox (FFX) or gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GnP) to be used as the first-line drugs for pancreatic cancer (PC) is yet to be established. We conducted an analysis of retrospective studies to assess the efficacy and safety of these two regimens by comparing their survival and safety outcomes in patients with PC. Methods: We conducted an extensive review of two electronic databases from inception till February 2023 to include all the relevant studies that compared FFX with GnP published and unpublished work. Retrospective studies were only included. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled using hazard ratios (HRs), while objective response rate (ORR) and safety outcomes were pooled using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random effects model. Results: A total of 7,030 patients were identified in a total of 21 articles that were shortlisted. Pooled results concluded that neither FFX nor GnP was associated to increase the OS time (HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.83 - 1.04; P = 0.0001); however, FFX was more likely associated with increased PFS when compared to GnP (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81 - 0.97; P < 0.0001). ORR proved to be non-significant between the two regimens (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.64 - 1.27; P = 0.15). Safety outcomes included neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia and diarrhea. GnP was more associated with diarrhea (OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.22 - 3.15; P = 0.001), while FFX was seen to cause anemia (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.51 - 0.98; P = 0.10) in PC patients. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were in-significant in the two drug regimens (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.92 - 1.31; P = 0.33 and OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.60 - 1.13; P = 0.23, respectively). Conclusion: FFX and GnP showed a significant difference in increasing the PFS, while no difference was observed while measuring OS. Safety outcomes showed that FFX and GnP shared similar safety profiles as FFX was associated with hematological outcomes, while GnP was more associated with non-hematological outcomes.

Indexed as

FolfirinoxGemcitabine + nab-paclitaxelObjective response rateOverall survivalPancreatic cancerProgression-free survival

Identifiers

PMID37869244
PMCPMC10588495
OpenAlexW4386905499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.