Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37869237›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of oncology2023

Oral Administration of Glucosylceramide Suppresses Tumor Growth by Affecting the Ceramide/Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Balance in Breast Cancer Tissue.

Kazuki Moro, Hiroshi Ichikawa, Yu Koyama, Shun Abe, Haruka Uchida, Kana Naruse, Yasuo Obata, Junko Tsuchida, Chie Toshikawa, Mayuko Ikarashi and 8 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Central Roles of Glucosylceramide in Driving Cancer Pathogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kazuki MoroDivision of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Hiroshi IchikawaDivision of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Yu KoyamaDivision of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Shun AbeDivision of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Haruka UchidaDivision of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Kana NaruseDivision of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Yasuo ObataDivision of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Junko TsuchidaDivision of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Chie ToshikawaDivision of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Mayuko IkarashiDivision of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Yusuke MuneokaDivision of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Kohei MiuraDivision of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Yosuke TajimaDivision of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Yoshifumi ShimadaDivision of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Takashi KobayashiDivision of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Jun SakataDivision of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Kazuaki TakabeDivision of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Toshifumi WakaiDivision of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Niigata University · JPUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Virus Vector Shared ResourceP30CA016059 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Renato Martins · 1985 to 2026
$51.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ceramide and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) play opposing roles in cell death and survival, and maintain a dynamic balance called the sphingolipid rheostat. Glucosylceramide is a substrate to generate ceramide but its effect on breast cancer by oral administration was never tested. The purpose of this study was to reveal the anticancer activity of glucosylceramide and its potential as a new therapeutic agent in breast cancer. Methods: E0771 cells were inoculated into the breast tissue of female C57BL/6NJcl mice. Glucosylceramide was administered orally to the mice for nine consecutive days. The concentrations of sphingolipid mediators including ceramide, glucosylceramide, and S1P in tumor tissues and serum were determined by mass spectrometry. Results: Oral administration of glucosylceramide significantly suppressed E0771 tumor growth compared with the control group (P = 0.006). There were no significant differences in the serum concentrations of sphingolipid mediators including ceramide and S1P between the mice treated with glucosylceramide and control-treated mice. The ceramide concentration was significantly lower in tumor tissues (P = 0.026), and the S1P concentration was significantly higher than that in paired non-tumor tissues (P = 0.009). The S1P concentration in tumor tissues was significantly lower in mice treated with glucosylceramide than in control-treated mice (P = 0.001). The ceramide-to-S1P concentration ratio in tumor tissues was significantly higher in mice treated with glucosylceramide than in control-treated mice (P = 0.034). Conclusions: Breast tumors could enhance their survival by increasing S1P conversion from ceramide. Oral administration of glucosylceramide suppressed tumor growth by affecting the ceramide/S1P balance. Oral administration of glucosylceramide is a promising basis for a new therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

Breast cancerCeramideGlucosylceramideSphingolipid rheostatSphingosin-1-phosphate

Identifiers

PMID37869237
PMCPMC10588502
OpenAlexW4386905528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.