Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37869202›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

What helps hospital staff in times of crisis: qualitative results of a survey on psychosocial resources and stressors in German hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Kira Schmidt-Stiedenroth, Lisa Guthardt, Melanie Genrich, Mara Köhne, Maja Stiawa, Rebecca Erschens, Florian Junne, Imad Maatouk, SEEGEN-Consortium, Harald Gündel and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Workload and mental health of nursing staff in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic-a scoping review].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kira Schmidt-StiedenrothInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Lisa GuthardtInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Melanie GenrichInstitute of Psychology, Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
Mara KöhneInstitute of Psychology, Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
Maja StiawaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Rebecca ErschensDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Florian JunneDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Imad MaatoukDepartment of General Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
SEEGEN-Consortium
Harald GündelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Peter AngererInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Andreas MüllerInstitute of Psychology, Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, hospital workers faced a tremendous workload. The pandemic led to different and additional strain that negatively affected the well-being of employees. This study aims to explore psychosocial resources and strategies that were used by hospital staff. Methods: In the context of an intervention study, employees of three German hospitals were questioned in writing in summer and fall 2020. Five open-ended questions about the pandemic were asked to capture corresponding effects on daily work routine. Answers of 303 participants were evaluated using structuring qualitative content analysis. Results: Significant stressors and resources were identified in the areas of work content and task, social relations at work, organization of work, work environment and individual aspects. Stressors included, for example, emotional demands, conflicts, an increased workload, time and performance pressure. Important resources mentioned were, among others, the exchange with colleagues and mutual support. Sound information exchange, clear processes and guidelines and a positive work atmosphere were also important. In addition, the private environment and a positive mindset were perceived as helpful. Conclusion: This study contributes to a differentiated understanding of existing psychosocial resources of hospital staff in times of crisis. Identifying and strengthening these resources could reduce stress and improve well-being, making hospital staff better prepared for both normal operations and further crisis situations.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHospitalsHumansPersonnel, HospitalSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19Germanyhospitalpsychosocial working conditionsresourcesstressors

Identifiers

PMID37869202
PMCPMC10585258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.