ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
Suitable ultrasound screening method for older adults with disability to identify low muscle mass.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and consistency of different ultrasound protocols for the measurement of gastrocnemius muscle (GM) thickness and to identify a suitable ultrasound scheme that can be used to detect the low muscle mass in older with disability. Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional study, each participant underwent three different ultrasound protocols for the measurement of the GM thickness, and each measurement was repeated three times. The three measurement schemes were as follows: method A, lying on the examination bed in a prone position with legs stretched and relaxed and feet hanging outside the examination bed; method B, lateral right side lying position with legs separated (left leg flexed and right leg in a relaxed state); and method C, right side lying position with legs together and lower limb muscles in a relaxed state. The low muscle mass was determined by averaging two or three measurements of the GM thickness determined using different sonographic protocols. Results: The study included 489 participants. The difference in the prevalence of low muscle mass identified between two and three replicates of the same measurement protocol ranged from 0 to 1.3%. Considering the three repeated measurements of the method A as the reference, the area under the curve (AUC) in different measurement schemes were 0.977-1 and 0.973-1 in males and females, respectively. Furthermore, male and female Kappa values from low to high were 0.773, 0.801, 0.829, 0.839, and 0.967 and 0.786, 0.794, 0.804, 0.819, and 0.984, respectively. Conclusion: Different ultrasound measurement protocols showed high accuracy and consistency in identifying low muscle mass. Repeating the measurements two or three times was found to be feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.