Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37869155›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Development and validation of an artificial intelligence-powered acne grading system incorporating lesion identification.

Jiaqi Li, Dan Du, Jianwei Zhang, Wenjie Liu, Junyou Wang, Xin Wei, Li Xue, Xiaoxue Li, Ping Diao, Lei Zhang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Demographic Reporting and the Absence of Hispanic/Latino Representation in Dermatology Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiaqi Li *Department of Dermatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Dan Du *Department of Dermatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jianwei ZhangMed-X Center for Informatics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wenjie LiuMed-X Center for Informatics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Junyou WangMed-X Center for Informatics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xin WeiMed-X Center for Informatics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Li XueDepartment of Dermatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoxue LiDepartment of Dermatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ping DiaoDepartment of Dermatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Lei ZhangMed-X Center for Informatics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xian JiangDepartment of Dermatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
West China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The management of acne requires the consideration of its severity; however, a universally adopted evaluation system for clinical practice is lacking. Artificial intelligence (AI) evaluation systems hold the promise of enhancing the efficiency and reproducibility of assessments. Artificial intelligence (AI) evaluation systems offer the potential to enhance the efficiency and reproducibility of assessments in this domain. While the identification of skin lesions represents a crucial component of acne evaluation, existing AI systems often overlook lesion identification or fail to integrate it with severity assessment. This study aimed to develop an AI-powered acne grading system and compare its performance with physician image-based scoring. Methods: A total of 1,501 acne patients were included in the study, and standardized pictures were obtained using the VISIA system. The initial evaluation involved 40 stratified sampled frontal photos assessed by seven dermatologists. Subsequently, the three doctors with the highest inter-rater agreement annotated the remaining 1,461 images, which served as the dataset for the development of the AI system. The dataset was randomly divided into two groups: 276 images were allocated for training the acne lesion identification platform, and 1,185 images were used to assess the severity of acne. Results: The average precision of our model for skin lesion identification was 0.507 and the average recall was 0.775. The AI severity grading system achieved good agreement with the true label (linear weighted kappa = 0.652). After integrating the lesion identification results into the severity assessment with fixed weights and learnable weights, the kappa rose to 0.737 and 0.696, respectively, and the entire evaluation on a Linux workstation with a Tesla K40m GPU took less than 0.1s per picture. Conclusion: This study developed a system that detects various types of acne lesions and correlates them well with acne severity grading, and the good accuracy and efficiency make this approach potentially an effective clinical decision support tool.

Indexed as

acneacne lesionsartificial intelligencedermatologygrading system

Identifiers

PMID37869155
PMCPMC10587552
OpenAlexW4387403350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.