Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37869042›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Timing of Jones Tube Placement After Excision of Nasal or Lacrimal Drainage System Malignancy: A Survey of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS).

Tom Kornhauser, Christian M Ponder, Philip W Dockery, Anna B Sharabura, Wade Brock, John Nguyen, John D Pemberton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tom KornhauserJones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Christian M PonderJones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Philip W DockeryJones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Anna B SharaburaCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Wade BrockCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
John NguyenWest Virginia University, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Cancer, Morgantown, WV, USA.
John D PembertonJones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USArkansas Cardiology · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To elicit, from a survey of oculoplastic surgeons, the timing and reason for delaying Jones tube placement after the excision of nasal or lacrimal drainage system malignancy. Methods: The authors reviewed current literature and distributed an anonymous survey to 627 members of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS) to determine the length of time members wait to perform a Jones tube placement after the removal of nasal or lacrimal drainage system malignancy. The survey also included questions about the rationale for this waiting period. Results: Fifty-eight members of ASOPRS (9.3%) responded to our survey, 49 (84.4%) of whom had performed Jones tube placement on patients who had an excision of a nasal or lacrimal drainage system malignancy. Nearly 52% of respondents waited one year for Jones tube placement. However, a sizeable number of respondents opted to wait five years (15.1%). The most common rationale for waiting was a concern for tumor recurrence (42 responses). Conclusion: There is no consensus on when to perform Jones tube placement after the excision of nasal or lacrimal drainage system malignancy. This survey demonstrates a broad array of waiting periods between operations, although most surgeons wait 12 months.

Indexed as

cDCRConjunctivodacryocystorhinostomyJones TubeMalignant Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID37869042
PMCPMC10589402
OpenAlexW4387687344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.