Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37869028›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

In Vivo Visualization and Quantification of Optic Disc Microvasculature for Assessing Renal Dysfunction.

Xiao Guo, Zhuoting Zhu, Weijing Cheng, Gabriella Bulloch, Wenbin Zhang, Yifan Chen, Yuting Li, Xiaoling Liang, Wenyong Huang, Wei Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Xiao GuoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Zhuoting ZhuCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Weijing ChengState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Gabriella BullochCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Wenbin ZhangZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yifan ChenJohn Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Yuting LiState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoling LiangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Wenyong HuangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Wei WangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNCentre for Eye Research Australia · AUJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the relationship between optic disc microvasculature and renal function in subjects with diabetes mellitus without diabetic retinopathy (DR). Design: Prospective, cross-sectional study. Participants: A total 1629 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without DR were recruited from the community of Guangzhou, China. Methods: All subjects underwent 6 mm × 6 mm OCT angiography (OCTA) centered on the optic nerve head. Four state-of-the-art microcirculation parameters, including peripapillary vessel density (PVD) in the radial peripapillary capillaries (RPC), superficial capillary plexus, deep capillary plexus (DCP), and a choriocapillaris flow void density percentage (CC FVD%) were assessed via swept-source OCTA. Primary Outcomes: Renal function was assessed by levels of microalbuminuria (MAU) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Results: Compared with non-chronic kidney disease (CKD) participants, PVD was significantly lower in subjects in the CKD group and worsened as eGFR declined. After adjustment for covariates, higher eGFR was significantly associated with higher PVD in the RPC (β = 0.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.02; Conclusion: Decrease in retinal and choroidal microcirculation in the optic nerve head was independently associated with renal dysfunction. Further longitudinal studies are needed to clarify the peripapillary vessel changes during CKD progression. Financial Disclosures: The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Indexed as

Diabetic retinopathyOptic nerve headRenal functionRetinal microcirculationSS-OCTA

Identifiers

PMID37869028
PMCPMC10587628
OpenAlexW4382933726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.