Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868993›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Boosting with an aerosolized Ad5-nCoV elicited robust immune responses in inactivated COVID-19 vaccines recipients.

Zhe Zhang, Shipo Wu, Yawei Liu, Kailiang Li, Pengfei Fan, Xiaohong Song, Yudong Wang, Zhenghao Zhao, Xianwei Zhang, Jin Shang and 21 more

Open access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Developing the next-generation of adenoviral vector vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhe ZhangBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Shipo WuBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Yawei LiuHealth Service Department of the Guard Bureau of the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, Beijing, China.
Kailiang LiHealth Service Department of the Guard Bureau of the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, Beijing, China.
Pengfei FanBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Xiaohong SongBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Yudong WangBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Zhenghao ZhaoBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Xianwei ZhangHealth Service Department of the Guard Bureau of the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, Beijing, China.
Jin ShangHealth Service Department of the Guard Bureau of the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, Beijing, China.
Jinlong ZhangBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Jinghan XuBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Yao LiBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Yaohui LiBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Jipeng ZhangHealth Service Department of the Guard Bureau of the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, Beijing, China.
Kefan FuHealth Service Department of the Guard Bureau of the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, Beijing, China.
Busen WangBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Meng HaoBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Guanying ZhangBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Pengwei LongHealth Service Department of the Guard Bureau of the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, Beijing, China.
Ziyu QiuHealth Service Department of the Guard Bureau of the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, Beijing, China.
Tao ZhuCanSino Biologics Inc., Tianjin, China.
Shuling LiuBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Yue ZhangBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Fangze ShaoBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Peng LvBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Yilong YangBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Xiaofan ZhaoBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Yufa SunHealth Service Department of the Guard Bureau of the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, Beijing, China.
Lihua HouBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Wei ChenBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China.
Central Committee of the Communist Party of China · CNCanSino (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has become the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant and exhibits immune escape to current COVID-19 vaccines, the further boosting strategies are required. Methods: We have conducted a non-randomized, open-label and parallel-controlled phase 4 trial to evaluate the magnitude and longevity of immune responses to booster vaccination with intramuscular adenovirus vectored vaccine (Ad5-nCoV), aerosolized Ad5-nCoV, a recombinant protein subunit vaccine (ZF2001) or homologous inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) in those who received two doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines. Results: The aerosolized Ad5-nCoV induced the most robust and long-lasting neutralizing activity against Omicron variant and IFNg T-cell response among all the boosters, with a distinct mucosal immune response. SARS-CoV-2-specific mucosal IgA response was substantially generated in subjects boosted with the aerosolized Ad5-nCoV at day 14 post-vaccination. At month 6, participants boosted with the aerosolized Ad5-nCoV had remarkably higher median titer and seroconversion of the Omicron BA.4/5-specific neutralizing antibody than those who received other boosters. Discussion: Our findings suggest that aerosolized Ad5-nCoV may provide an efficient alternative in response to the spread of the Omicron BA.4/5 variant. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=152729, identifier ChiCTR2200057278.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAntibodiesHumansImmunity, MucosalSARS-CoV-2Vaccines, InactivatedVaccines, SubunitAntibodiesCOVID-19 Vaccinessinovac COVID-19 vaccineVaccines, InactivatedVaccines, SubunitZF2001 COVID-19 vaccineAd5-nCoV vaccineaerosolizedBA.5 Omicron Variantneutralizing Abssaliva IgASARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37868993
PMCPMC10585368
OpenAlexW4387340142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.