ArticleJournal of biomedical physics & engineering2023
Investigating the Ability of Radiomics Features for Diagnosis of the Active Plaque of Multiple Sclerosis Patients.
Article in Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Gadolinium-Sparing Detection of Active Multiple Sclerosis Lesions: A Structured Narrative Review.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Current Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Ophthalmic Imaging: A Narrative Approach.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Assessing AI-augmented training for multiple sclerosis classification in a basal ganglia radiomics model.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Current imaging applications, radiomics, and machine learning modalities of CNS demyelinating disorders and its mimickers.Journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Differentiation between multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optic spectrum disorders with multilevel fMRI features: A machine learning analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common non-traumatic disabling disease. Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the ability of radiomics features for diagnosing active plaques in patients with MS from T Material and Methods: In this experimental study, images of 82 patients with 122 MS lesions were investigated. Boruta and Relief algorithms were used for feature selection on the train data set (70%). Four different classifier algorithms, including Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Gradient Boosting (GB), Decision Tree (DT), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) were used as classifiers for modeling. Finally, Performance metrics were obtained on the test data set (30%) with 1000 bootstrap and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results: A total of 107 radiomics features were extracted for each lesion, of which 7 and 8 features were selected by the Relief method and Boruta method, respectively. DT classifier had the best performance in the two feature selection algorithms. The best performance on the test data set was related to Boruta-DT with an average accuracy of 0.86, sensitivity of 1.00, specificity of 0.84, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.92-0.92). Conclusion: Radiomics features have the potential for diagnosing MS active plaque by T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.