Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868869›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2023

Robotic chest wall resection for primary benign chest wall tumors and locally advanced lung cancer: an institutional case series and national report.

Raymond A Verm, Wickii T Vigneswaran, Andrew Lin, Joseph Zywiciel, Richard Freeman, Zaid M Abdelsattar

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Robotic Thoracic Surgery: Current Landscape and Future Directions.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raymond A VermDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.
Wickii T VigneswaranDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.
Andrew LinDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.
Joseph ZywicielDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.
Richard FreemanDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.
Zaid M AbdelsattarDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.
Loyola University Medical Center · USEdward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Limited data exists for robotic chest wall resection; we report institutional and national experience of robotic chest wall resection. Methods: In this comparative retrospective case series we describe patients who underwent robotic chest wall resection at our institution and enrich this case series with data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). We describe our preoperative workup, operative technique, and postoperative care. Outcomes included conversion to open, length of stay, readmissions, and 30- and 90-day mortality. The results are descriptively reported and compared. Results: We describe 6 patients institutionally and 96 NCDB patients. At our institution 66.7% were males, median age was 70.0 (range, 39-91) years, and 50% were primary chest wall tumors. Median tumor size was 5.25 (range, 2.3-8.3) cm. Outcomes were as follows: no open conversions, median length of stay 3 (range, 1-6) days, no unplanned 30-day readmissions or 90-day mortality. In the NCDB, 55.2% were males with median age of 68.5 (range, 30-89) years. Median tumor size was 3.90 (range, 2.4-6.0) cm. NCDB outcomes were as follows: 18.8% open conversion, median length of stay 7 (range, 5-10) days, 3.1% unplanned 30-day readmission, and 8.3% 90-day mortality. Our institutional case series had 18.0 months median follow-up (range, 6-54 months) with no functional deficits. Median survival in NCDB was 49.6 months. Conclusions: Robotic chest wall resection is feasible and is performed nationally with acceptable short- and long-term outcomes. Our institutional experience reports our technique, resultant short hospital stay, and excellent functional outcomes.

Indexed as

case seriesChest walllung cancer surgeryminimally invasive surgeryrobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID37868869
PMCPMC10586962
OpenAlexW4387101658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.