ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2023
The role of extracorporeal life support in extended lung resections for non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current advances in extended resections for non-small cell lung cancer-a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may be used as a substitute of traditional cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in thoracic surgeries. Extended resections for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) occasionally require extracorporeal life support. We present a narrative review of the current clinical uses of extracorporeal devices in this setting of patients. Methods: We searched Medline database/PubMed for "extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation" and "non-small cell lung carcinoma" in the English language literature between the years 2000 and 2022. Key Content and Findings: As opposed to CPB, ECMO is simple, requires minimal or no anticoagulation and elicits fewer complications. T4 lung cancers are frequently considered for surgery in marginally operable patients. ECMO may provide the means to achieve these resections. There are case series of carinal extended resections safely performed under venovenous (VV) or venoarterial (VA) support. The main advantages are a clear surgical field, certainty of proper oxygenation and avoidance of ventilator induced trauma. Left atrial resections have been described with VA ECMO, but the standard of care is still CPB. Descending thoracic aorta resections can also benefit from extracorporeal support, making sure that abdominal organs and lower limbs are well perfused, the heart is not overloaded, and cross clamping is safe. Conclusions: Surgeons performing extended lung cancer resections should be familiar with ECMO and are encouraged to report their experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.