ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2023
Extracorporeal life support as a bridge to lung transplantation: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of preoperative venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation bridging on postoperative acute kidney injury after lung transplantation.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2026Article
- High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Patients Awaiting Lung Transplant: Evidence, Clinical Applications, and Outcomes.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2026Review
- Six-Year Single-Center Experience with ECMO Use in Various Strategies for Lung Transplantation, Including COVID-19 Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Postoperative conditions of rehabilitative interest in lung transplantation: a systematic review.Journal of Yeungnam medical science · 2024Article
- Venopulmonary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for right ventricular support as a bridge to lung transplantation: A narrative review.SAGE open medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The utilization of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) as a bridge to lung transplantation (LTx) has rapidly expanded over recent years in highly urgent patients even though the reported outcomes in current literature are still divergent. The aim of our narrative review was to provide a comprehensive picture on the peri and post-operative outcomes of patients bridged to LTx with this device from the most updated literature in the field. Methods: The literature about ECLS bridge to LTx was searched on PubMed using a formal strategy. We focused our research on studies published between 2015 and 2022 and in English language. Abstracts, case reports, conference presentations, editorials, expert opinions and review articles were excluded. Key Content and Findings: ECLS has emerged as a valid tool to bridge critically ill patients to LTx. Some issues, like the selection of candidates and the post-operative outcomes, are still matter of debate in the current reported series. We analyzed 14 papers published in the last seven years and with at least 20 patients to provide an updated overview on this topic. We found that, in highly experienced centers, ECLS can be used as a good strategy to allow critically ill patients to remain eligible to LTx with satisfying post-operative outcomes. Conclusions: Specific scores and algorithms should be implemented to improve the selection process of candidates who could benefit more from ECLS as a bridge to LTx. Ambulatory/awake ECLS strategies should be always preferred to enroll patients in active rehabilitation programs awaiting LTx, improving short and long-term outcomes and increasing the success of LTx.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.