Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868850›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2023

Real-world effectiveness of azvudine for patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 omicron subvariant BA.5 in an intensive care unit.

Xiuping Qi, Yun Yang, Baoqiang Gong, Zhiwei Li, Dong Liang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Real-World Evaluation Study of Azvudine for the Treatment of Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiuping QiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Sanya Central Hospital (The Third People's Hospital of Hainan Province), Sanya, China.
Yun YangDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Sanya Central Hospital (The Third People's Hospital of Hainan Province), Sanya, China.
Baoqiang GongDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Sanya Central Hospital (The Third People's Hospital of Hainan Province), Sanya, China.
Zhiwei LiDepartment of Radiology, Sanya Central Hospital (The Third People's Hospital of Hainan Province), Sanya, China.
Dong LiangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Sanya Central Hospital (The Third People's Hospital of Hainan Province), Sanya, China.
Sanya Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Azvudine (FNC) has been shown to be effective against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but data regarding the Omicron BA.5.1.3 subvariant are lacking. This retrospective analysis investigated the effectiveness and safety of FNC against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5.1.3 subvariant in a real-world setting, utilizing data from a patient cohort at our institution. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of Sanya Central Hospital during the Sanya outbreak (August 13 to September 7, 2022). The patients, all infected with the Omicron BA.5.1.3 subvariant, were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients were classified as the FNC (azvudine 5 mg, qd + standard supportive treatment) and non-FNC (standard supportive treatment only) groups. Results: The study comprised 13 patients, with 6 and 7 in the FNC and non-FNC groups, respectively. Baseline data, clinical features, and imaging manifestations were generally similar between the two groups. However, patients administered FNC demonstrated significantly lower levels of inflammatory indicators at baseline. Although there was no significant difference in the duration of ICU stay between the FNC and non-FNC groups, overall ICU stay appeared to be reduced in the FNC group. Conclusions: FNC emerges as a feasible treatment against the Omicron BA.5.1.3 subvariant. It may reduce ICU stay and demonstrate a promising safety profile without major side effects or disruption to normal physiological parameters.

Indexed as

Azvudineintensive care unit (ICU)severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 omicron subvariant BA.5 (SARS-CoV-2 omicron subvariant BA.5)

Identifiers

PMID37868850
PMCPMC10586978
OpenAlexW4387101608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.