Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868824›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2023

Risk factors for stillbirth at term: an Italian area-based, prospective cohort study.

Cristina Salerno, Beatrice Melis, Valeria Donno, Gloria Guariglia, Daniela Menichini, Enrica Perrone, Fabio Facchinetti, Francesca Monari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cristina SalernoObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Mother-Infant and Adult Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy (Drs Salerno, Melis, Donno, Guariglia, Facchinetti, and Monari).
Beatrice MelisObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Mother-Infant and Adult Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy (Drs Salerno, Melis, Donno, Guariglia, Facchinetti, and Monari).
Valeria DonnoObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Mother-Infant and Adult Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy (Drs Salerno, Melis, Donno, Guariglia, Facchinetti, and Monari).
Gloria GuarigliaObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Mother-Infant and Adult Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy (Drs Salerno, Melis, Donno, Guariglia, Facchinetti, and Monari).
Daniela MenichiniInternational Doctorate School in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy (Dr Menichini).
Enrica PerroneEmilia-Romagna Health and Welfare Directorate, Community Care Department, Bologna, Italy (Dr Perrone).
Fabio FacchinettiObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Mother-Infant and Adult Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy (Drs Salerno, Melis, Donno, Guariglia, Facchinetti, and Monari).
Francesca MonariObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Mother-Infant and Adult Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy (Drs Salerno, Melis, Donno, Guariglia, Facchinetti, and Monari).
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITAgenzia Sanitaria e Sociale Regionale · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStillbirth at term has great emotional impact on both parents and professionals. In developed countries, efforts to identify risk factors are mandatory to plan area-specific prevention strategies.

objectiveThe aim of the study was to identify independent risk factors that contribute to stillbirth at 37 weeks' gestation or later. STUDY

designThis was an area-based, prospective cohort study on pregnancy at term with enrolled from 2014 to 2021 in Emilia-Romagna, a north Italian region. Data were retrieved from both birth certificates and the Stillbirth Surveillance system database. To identify independent risk factors, a multivariate analysis using logistic regression was performed. A descriptive analysis of the causes of stillbirth is also reported.

resultsIn the observation period, 246,437 babies born at term (including 260 stillbirths, giving a rate of 1.06/1000) were considered. The risk factors independently associated with stillbirth were small for gestational age babies (odds ratio, 2.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.88-3.53), pregnancy achieved though fertility treatments (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-3.51), and delayed access to pregnancy services (odds ratio, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.22). In multipara, the presence of a previous stillbirth (odds ratio, 3.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.98-7.72) was also associated with an increased risk for recurrence. Early- rather than late-term was an additional risk factor. The most frequent causes of death were placental and cord disorders (61/260 and 56/260, respectively). However, 28.1% of cases remain unexplained.

conclusionThe risks for stillbirth at term are known early in pregnancy or could be identified through tailored antenatal management, allowing effective preventive strategies to reduce preventable cases.

Indexed as

access to antenatal caresfertility treatmentspreventionrisk factorssmall for gestational agestillbirthterm pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37868824
PMCPMC10585316
OpenAlexW4386836617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.