Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868796›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Machine Learning to Predict Faricimab Treatment Outcome in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Yusuke Kikuchi, Michael G Kawczynski, Neha Anegondi, Ales Neubert, Jian Dai, Daniela Ferrara, Carlos Quezada-Ruiz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02484690 (A Multiple-Center, Multiple-Dose and Regimen, Randomized, Active Comparator Controlled, Double-Masked, Parallel Group, 36 Week Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of RO6867461 Administered Intravitreally in Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02484690 phase2completednot on this map

A Multiple-Center, Multiple-Dose and Regimen, Randomized, Active Comparator Controlled, Double-Masked, Parallel Group, 36 Week Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of RO6867461 Administered Intravitreally in Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2015 to 2017Enrolled273ConditionsChoroidal NeovascularizationArmsFaricimab, Ranibizumab, Sham Procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yusuke KikuchiRoche Personalized Healthcare Program, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.
Michael G KawczynskiRoche Personalized Healthcare Program, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.
Neha AnegondiRoche Personalized Healthcare Program, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.
Ales NeubertData & Analytics, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Basel, Switzerland.
Jian DaiRoche Personalized Healthcare Program, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.
Daniela FerraraRoche Personalized Healthcare Program, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.
Carlos Quezada-RuizClinical Science, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop machine learning (ML) models to predict, at baseline, treatment outcomes at month 9 in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) receiving faricimab. Design: Retrospective proof of concept study. Participants: Patients enrolled in the phase II AVENUE trial (NCT02484690) of faricimab in nAMD. Methods: Baseline characteristics and spectral domain-OCT (SD-OCT) image data from 185 faricimab-treated eyes were split into 80% training and 20% test sets at the patient level. Input variables were baseline age, sex, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), low luminance deficit, treatment arm, and SD-OCT images. A regression problem (BCVA) and a binary classification problem (reduction of CST by 35%) were considered. Overall, 10 models were developed and tested for each problem. Benchmark classical ML models (linear, random forest, extreme gradient boosting) were trained on baseline characteristics; benchmark deep neural networks (DNNs) were trained on baseline SD-OCT B-scans. Baseline characteristics and SD-OCT data were merged using 2 approaches: model stacking (using DNN prediction as an input feature for classical ML models) and model averaging (which averaged predictions from the DNN using SD-OCT volume and from classical ML models using baseline characteristics). Main Outcome Measures: Treatment outcomes were defined by 2 target variables: functional (BCVA letter score) and anatomical (percent decrease in CST from baseline) outcomes at month 9. Results: The best-performing BCVA regression model with respect to the test coefficient of determination (R Conclusions: Promising signals for predicting treatment outcomes from baseline characteristics were detected; however, the predictive benefit of baseline images was unclear in this proof-of-concept study. Further testing and validation with larger, independent datasets is required to fully explore the predictive capacity of ML models using baseline imaging data. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

FaricimabMachine learningNeovascular age-related macular degenerationOptical coherence tomographyTreatment

Identifiers

PMID37868796
PMCPMC10585644
OpenAlexW4385989160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.