ArticleOphthalmology science
Machine Learning to Predict Faricimab Treatment Outcome in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02484690 (A Multiple-Center, Multiple-Dose and Regimen, Randomized, Active Comparator Controlled, Double-Masked, Parallel Group, 36 Week Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of RO6867461 Administered Intravitreally in Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multiple-Center, Multiple-Dose and Regimen, Randomized, Active Comparator Controlled, Double-Masked, Parallel Group, 36 Week Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of RO6867461 Administered Intravitreally in Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ophthalmic drug discovery and development using artificial intelligence and digital health technologies.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Faricimab in Age-Related Macular Degeneration-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A scoping review of artificial intelligence applications in clinical trial risk assessment.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: An Updated Comprehensive Review.Journal of ophthalmic & vision researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop machine learning (ML) models to predict, at baseline, treatment outcomes at month 9 in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) receiving faricimab. Design: Retrospective proof of concept study. Participants: Patients enrolled in the phase II AVENUE trial (NCT02484690) of faricimab in nAMD. Methods: Baseline characteristics and spectral domain-OCT (SD-OCT) image data from 185 faricimab-treated eyes were split into 80% training and 20% test sets at the patient level. Input variables were baseline age, sex, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), low luminance deficit, treatment arm, and SD-OCT images. A regression problem (BCVA) and a binary classification problem (reduction of CST by 35%) were considered. Overall, 10 models were developed and tested for each problem. Benchmark classical ML models (linear, random forest, extreme gradient boosting) were trained on baseline characteristics; benchmark deep neural networks (DNNs) were trained on baseline SD-OCT B-scans. Baseline characteristics and SD-OCT data were merged using 2 approaches: model stacking (using DNN prediction as an input feature for classical ML models) and model averaging (which averaged predictions from the DNN using SD-OCT volume and from classical ML models using baseline characteristics). Main Outcome Measures: Treatment outcomes were defined by 2 target variables: functional (BCVA letter score) and anatomical (percent decrease in CST from baseline) outcomes at month 9. Results: The best-performing BCVA regression model with respect to the test coefficient of determination (R Conclusions: Promising signals for predicting treatment outcomes from baseline characteristics were detected; however, the predictive benefit of baseline images was unclear in this proof-of-concept study. Further testing and validation with larger, independent datasets is required to fully explore the predictive capacity of ML models using baseline imaging data. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.