ArticleOphthalmology science
Dynamic Stimulation Aberrometry: Objectively Measured Accommodation and Pupil Dynamics after Phakic Iris-Fixated Intraocular Lens Implantation.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Anterior iris-claw phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) implantation is a treatment option for refractive, ametropic patients. However, the postoperative accommodative ability has not been systematically researched. Dynamic stimulation aberrometry allows the objective and dynamical measurement of accommodation by observing ocular aberrations during the accommodation process. We investigated the dynamic accommodative ability after pIOL implantation compared with a healthy age- and gender-matched control group. Design: Clinical, comparative case-control study. Subjects: We included patients aged 18-50 years that either underwent pIOL implantation > 1 month ago or served as a healthy, phakic control group. Methods: The accommodative ability and pupil dynamics of both groups were investigated using dynamic stimulation aberrometry. The method allows the analysis of dynamic parameters during accommodation, such as the accommodation speed. A 1:1 propensity score matching was conducted based on the patients' age and gender. Main Outcome Measures: Parameters of objective accommodation, such as accommodative amplitude and pupil dynamic during accommodation. Results: Fifty-eight healthy, phakic eyes < 50 years of age and 21 eyes after pIOL implantation to correct myopia (pIOL, Verisyse, AMO, Inc) were enrolled. Patients that underwent anterior pIOL implantation were examined on average 24 ± 18 months after surgery. After matching, the mean age of both groups was not significantly different (35 ± 8 vs. 34 ± 8 years). No significant difference in dynamic parameters of accommodation or the accommodative amplitude (2.8 ± 1.4 and 2.9 ± 1.4 diopters [D] for pIOL and control group, Conclusions: Dynamic stimulation aberrometry allowed the objective, dynamic, measurement of wavefronts in subjects with accommodative amplitudes up to 7 D. Phakic intraocular lens implantation does not impair the accommodative ability. It alters pupil dynamics during deaccommodation. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.