Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868792›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

One-shot Retinal Artery and Vein Segmentation via Cross-modality Pretraining.

Danli Shi, Shuang He, Jiancheng Yang, Yingfeng Zheng, Mingguang He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danli ShiCentre for Eye and Vision Research (CEVR), Hong Kong SAR, China.
Shuang HeState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Jiancheng YangSwiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Yingfeng ZhengState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Mingguang HeCentre for Eye and Vision Research (CEVR), Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To perform one-shot retinal artery and vein segmentation with cross-modality artery-vein (AV) soft-label pretraining. Design: Cross-sectional study. Subjects: The study included 6479 color fundus photography (CFP) and arterial-venous fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) pairs from 1964 participants for pretraining and 6 AV segmentation data sets with various image sources, including RITE, HRF, LES-AV, AV-WIDE, PortableAV, and DRSplusAV for one-shot finetuning and testing. Methods: We structurally matched the arterial and venous phase of FFA with CFP, the AV soft labels were automatically generated by utilizing the fluorescein intensity difference of the arterial and venous-phase FFA images, and the soft labels were then used to train a generative adversarial network to learn to generate AV soft segmentations using CFP images as input. We then finetuned the pretrained model to perform AV segmentation using only one image from each of the AV segmentation data sets and test on the remainder. To investigate the effect and reliability of one-shot finetuning, we conducted experiments without finetuning and by finetuning the pretrained model on an iteratively different single image for each data set under the same experimental setting and tested the models on the remaining images. Main Outcome Measures: The AV segmentation was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, Dice score, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: After the FFA-AV soft label pretraining, our method required only one exemplar image from each camera or modality and achieved similar performance with full-data training, with AUC ranging from 0.901 to 0.971, accuracy from 0.959 to 0.980, Dice score from 0.585 to 0.773, sensitivity from 0.574 to 0.763, and specificity from 0.981 to 0.991. Compared with no finetuning, the segmentation performance improved after one-shot finetuning. When finetuned on different images in each data set, the standard deviation of the segmentation results across models ranged from 0.001 to 0.10. Conclusions: This study presents the first one-shot approach to retinal artery and vein segmentation. The proposed labeling method is time-saving and efficient, demonstrating a promising direction for retinal-vessel segmentation and enabling the potential for widespread application. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Cross-modality pretrainingDomain generalizationOne-shotRetinal artery and vein segmentation

Identifiers

PMID37868792
PMCPMC10585631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.