Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868705›Full record

ArticleVeterinary record open2023

Prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and feline enteric coronavirus (FECV) in shelter-housed cats in the Central Valley of California, USA.

Daniel Chen, Andrés M López-Pérez, Karen M Vernau, David J Maggs, Soohyun Kim, Janet Foley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary record open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel ChenDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology School of Veterinary Medicine University of California Davis California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3466-3390
Andrés M López-PérezDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology School of Veterinary Medicine University of California Davis California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5726-7943
Karen M VernauDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences School of Veterinary Medicine University of California Davis California USA.
David J MaggsDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences School of Veterinary Medicine University of California Davis California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6537-4335
Soohyun KimWilliam R. Pritchard Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital School of Veterinary Medicine University of California Davis California USA.
Janet FoleyDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology School of Veterinary Medicine University of California Davis California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9078-283X
University of California, Davis · USInstituto de Ecología · MXVeterinary Medical Teaching Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Non-human animals are natural hosts for the virus causing COVID-19 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2]) and a diversity of species appear susceptible to infection. Cats are of particular concern because of their close affiliation with humans and susceptibility to infection. Cats also harbour feline enteric coronavirus (FECV). Our objectives were to document the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and FECV in feline populations with high turnover and movement among households in the Central Valley of California, USA. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 128 shelter and foster cats and kittens in the Central Valley of California was performed from July to December 2020. PCR was performed on rectal and oropharyngeal samples to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA and on rectal samples to detect FECV RNA. Results: Among 163 rectal and oropharyngeal fluid samples gathered from sheltered and fostered cats and kittens in central California, SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids were not detected from any cat or kitten. In contrast, FECV nucleic acids were detected in 18% of shelter-housed cats; 83% of these positive samples were collected from cats housed in adjacent cages. Conclusions: These data may be helpful when considering the allocation of resources to minimise the harm of FECV and SARS-CoV-2 in household pets and shelter environments.

Identifiers

PMID37868705
PMCPMC10589393
OpenAlexW4387848081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.