Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868691›Full record

ArticleGlobal advances in integrative medicine and health

Employee Group Coaching Program for University and Hospital Employees During COVID-19: A Feasibility Study.

Karen Westervelt, Gail L Rose, Scott Avery, Alisha Celley, Josh Cho, Rory Donoghue, Brennan Goodrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global advances in integrative medicine and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karen WesterveltOsher Center for Integrative Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Gail L RoseOsher Center for Integrative Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4997-401X
Scott AveryDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Alisha CelleyDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Josh ChoDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Rory DonoghueDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Brennan GoodrichDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Workplace wellbeing programs can be beneficial but range widely in approach. A group coaching model offers numerous benefits. Objective: To evaluate feasibility of group coaching for employees during COVID-19. Methods: Employees (n = 29) at a university and university hospital underwent a 12-week group coaching program. Measurements of feasibility -- including enrollment, attendance at sessions goal attainment and satisfaction -- and exploratory outcomes including perceived physical and mental health and stress were administered at beginning, middle, and end of the program, plus 2 follow-ups. Results: Twenty-six of the 29 program enrollees (96% women; 65% university employees) opted to complete surveys at 1 or more time points, and 9 individuals completed surveys at all 5 time points. Median attendance was 9 sessions. Participants opted to focus on movement, nutrition and mind/body goals and all participants reported making progress toward their goal during the program. Exploratory wellness outcomes showed meaningful improvements in perceived physical and mental health and reduced stress during the program, with return to near baseline 12 weeks after program completion. Perceptions of workplace wellness culture varied by employer. Conclusion: Despite pandemic-related disruptions to life, work, and health, online group coaching is feasible and acceptable to participants. The program should be replicated to evaluate whether the improvements in exploratory wellness outcomes observed during the program are statistically significant. The apparent return to baseline levels by 24 weeks suggests that post-program maintenance support may be helpful.

Indexed as

behavioral changeemployee wellbeinggroup coachinghealth coachingwellnesswellness coaching

Identifiers

PMID37868691
PMCPMC10588399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.