Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868591›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Validation of Italian students' self-ratings on the SSIS SEL brief scales.

Valeria Cavioni, Elisabetta Conte, Ilaria Grazzani, Veronica Ornaghi, Carmel Cefai, Christopher Anthony, Stephen N Elliott, Alessandro Pepe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Valeria CavioniDepartment of Humanities, Literature, Cultural Heritage, Education Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Elisabetta Conte"R. Massa" Department of Human Sciences for Education, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Ilaria Grazzani"R. Massa" Department of Human Sciences for Education, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Veronica Ornaghi"R. Massa" Department of Human Sciences for Education, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Carmel CefaiDepartment of Psychology, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Christopher AnthonySchool of Special Education, School Psychology, and Early Childhood Studies, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Stephen N ElliottSanford School of Social and Family Dynamics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Alessandro Pepe"R. Massa" Department of Human Sciences for Education, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITArizona State University · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Foggia · ITUniversity of Malta · MT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite increasing interest in measuring social and emotional learning (SEL), there is a lack of European-validated tools for assessing the efficacy of SEL programs. The aim of this study was to validate an Italian version of the social skills improvement system (SSIS) SEL brief scales-student form. Methods: Participants were 1,175 students (mean age: 11.02 years; SD: 2.42; range: 8-16 years; males: 46.8%) recruited at schools in Northern Italy. Statistical analyses and results: Initial confirmatory factor analysis encountered a series of challenges, implying non-convergence of the original five-factor measurement model (self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making) based on the Collaborative on Academic Social Emotional Learning (CASEL) competency framework established with students in the United States. Further exploratory and confirmatory analyses supported a four-factor model that remained partially invariant across gender groups. The Italian version of the SSIS SEL brief scales was thus shown to be an efficient measurement tool for estimating social and emotional learning in students. Discussion: We discuss the implications of findings in relation to selecting valid and reliable instruments for assessing children's and adolescents' SEL competencies, while considering the culturally-situated nature of the constructs under study.

Indexed as

adolescentschildrengender invariancemeasurement invariancesocial and emotional learningsocial skills improvement system SEL brief scales

Identifiers

PMID37868591
PMCPMC10585268
OpenAlexW4387375799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.