Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868569›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Smile Aesthetics Assessment in Patients Undergoing the Finishing Phase of Orthodontic Treatment: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.

Daniel Arrubla-Escobar, Diana M Barbosa-Liz, Oscar Zapata-Noreña, Alvaro Carvajal-Flórez, Karina Correa-Mullet, Sandra L Gómez-Gómez, Carlos M Ardila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Designing the Smile in Complete Denture Patient: An Ingenious Approach.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel Arrubla-EscobarBasic Sciences, Institución Universitaria Visión de Las Americas, Medellin, COL.
Diana M Barbosa-LizBasic Sciences, GIONORTO Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, COL.
Oscar Zapata-NoreñaBasic Sciences, GIONORTO Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, COL.
Alvaro Carvajal-FlórezBasic Sciences, GIONORTO Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, COL.
Karina Correa-MulletSchool of Dentistry, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, COL.
Sandra L Gómez-GómezBasic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, COL.
Carlos M ArdilaBasic Sciences, Biomedical Stomatology Research Group, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, COL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective To describe the smile characteristics of patients entering the finishing phase of orthodontic treatment. Methods This observational study involved a non-probabilistic sample of 48 patients. Clinical records served as the basis for determining the type of treatment (with or without extractions). Photographs were analyzed to obtain smile variables. Dental casts and panoramic radiographs were evaluated to ascertain the cast-radiograph evaluation (CRE) index. Univariate and bivariate analyses were conducted at a significance level of 0.05. Results The study evaluated 24 men and 24 women, with an average age of 20.10 ± 6.78 years. Fifty percent of the patients did not undergo extractions, and the average CRE index for the sample was 34.83 ± 9.01. Regarding the smile, a medium smile line was prevalent in 66.7% of cases, and a non-consonant smile arc was observed in 58.3%. Significant differences in the smile arc were found between patients with and without extractions (p=0.019). Right and left buccal corridors measured 2.52 mm ± 1.52 and 2.43 mm ± 1.37, respectively. The upper dental midline deviated by 0.80 ± 0.91 mm and had an angulation of 1.65 ± 2.05º. Both variables showed significant differences between Class I and Class II patients (p=0.020; p=0.027). Symmetrical smiles were also observed (1.05 ± 0.17). Conclusions Based on our findings, clinicians should focus on the smile arc in patients who have not undergone extractions and on the midline inclination in Class II patients. These appear to be the most common areas for improvement in patients who are in the finishing phase of treatment. Additionally, considerable variability exists in the smile characteristics of patients still undergoing orthodontic treatment, leaving room for further enhancement of results.

Indexed as

dental estheticsmalocclusionorthodonticssmilingtreatment

Identifiers

PMID37868569
PMCPMC10590081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.