Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868486›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Open Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis: A Literature Review.

Raam Mannam, Rajagopal Sankara Narayanan, Arpit Bansal, Vishnu R Yanamaladoddi, Sai Suseel Sarvepalli, Shree Laya Vemula, Saikumar Aramadaka

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07299656 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Outcome of Active Aspiration Versus Simple Compression to Remove Residual Gas From Abdominal Cavity in Reducing Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing Edward Medical UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled62ConditionsShoulder Pain, Abdominal Pain (AP)ArmsGroup A (Active Aspiration), simple compression
NCT07670052 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Intraperitoneal Instillation of Ketamine Versus Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Control in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy _a Double-blinded Randomized Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled84ConditionsPostoperative PainArmsFentanyl, Ketamine
NCT07672145 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Gallbladder Extraction Via the Subxiphoid Port and the Infraumbilical Port During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing Edward Medical UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled66ConditionsCholelithiasis (Without Cholecystitis), Cholecystitis, AcuteArmsSubxiphoid Gallbladder Retrieval, Infraumbilical Gallbladder Extraction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Raam MannamGeneral Surgery, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, IND.
Rajagopal Sankara NarayananResearch, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, IND.
Arpit BansalResearch, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, IND.
Vishnu R YanamaladoddiGeneral Surgery, Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore, IND.
Sai Suseel SarvepalliResearch, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, IND.
Shree Laya VemulaResearch, Anam Chenchu Subba Reddy (ACSR) Government Medical College, Nellore, IND.
Saikumar AramadakaInternal Medicine, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, IND.
Government Vellore Medical College · INNarayana Dental College and Hospital · INNarayan Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholecystectomy is a common surgical procedure performed worldwide for acute cholecystitis. Acute cholecystitis occurs when the cystic duct is obstructed by a gallstone, which causes gallbladder distension and subsequent inflammation of the gallbladder. Acute cholecystitis is characterized by pain in the right upper quadrant, anorexia, nausea, fever, and vomiting. Cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for acute cholecystitis. The two commonly performed types of cholecystectomies are open cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, the approach of choice widely fluctuates with regard to various factors such as patient history and surgeon preference. It is imperative to understand the variations in outcomes of different approaches and how best they fit an individual patient when deciding the technique to be undertaken. This article reviews several studies and compares the two techniques in terms of procedure, mortality rate, complication rate, bile leak/injury rate, conversion rate, and bleeding rate.

Indexed as

bile leak/injury rateconversion ratelaparoscopic cholecystectomymajor complication rateopen cholecystectomy

Identifiers

PMID37868486
PMCPMC10590170
OpenAlexW4386923640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.