Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868441›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Artificial Intelligence in Gynaecological Malignancies: Perspectives of a Clinical Oncologist.

Himanshi Khattar, Ruchica Goel, Piyush Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of gynecologic cancer.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Himanshi KhattarRadiation Oncology, Shri Ram Murti Samarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, IND.
Ruchica GoelGynaecological Oncology/In Vitro Fertilization, Shri Ram Murti Samarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, IND.
Piyush KumarRadiation Oncology, Shri Ram Murti Samarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gynecological malignancies are treated with a multi-disciplinary approach. There are two important factors, the stage and Karnofsky performance status scale (KPS) of patients, which guide the treatment strategy by single or multiple modalities in terms of surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy. Various aspects are included in the workflow of gynecological malignancies, like screening, diagnosis in each individual, treatment modalities, and finally, follow-up to see for outcomes leading to the development of new research protocols. The quality data plays an important role in every step. Artificial Intelligence (AI) will play an important role if it is developed in the above-mentioned steps. AI is already established partially in every aspect of the management of gynecological cancer. It needs to be strengthened and incorporated further in a more robust form. This needs an association between clinicians, software engineers, and stakeholders. This article reviews the role of AI in various steps of the workflow of gynecological malignancies and discusses a few clinical aspects that may be researched to find solutions by AI.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencechemotherapygynecological malignanciesquality assuranceradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37868441
PMCPMC10589801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.